+1 What he (they) said. :-) Consistently releasing releases.
-----Original Message----- From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 6:05 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Maven 1.1 gold? This is a great way of doing things, IMHO. It forces regular, reproducible builds. It allows widespread testing of those builds. It gathers a consensus outside the dev team on what is a recommended stable build. It provides for options other than the install of a major release and handpicking changes. On 4/8/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <SNIP/> > > > > > > > > Finally, as Jeff has pointed out, I am also not happy about the > > naming, I think m11b2 and the current m11b3-SNAPSHOT are far > > superior and more stable than the suffix 'beta' would suggest. > > > Personnaly I prefered if we follow a versionning convention like in > httpd, tomcat and some other projects. > These projects release regularly a new version X.Y.Z and launch a vote > to decide if this is a stable release or not. > It's wht you have in these projects a big number for Z. It's more a > build number than a fix number. > > But it's not actually the policy for maven. > > And again: any help would be very welcome! :) > > > YES !! :-) > > Arnaud > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
