yes
On 6/13/06, Lee Meador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do I remember right that you can build a tagged version?
On 6/13/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, it isn't possible to build a particular revision and I don't see the
> interest to do it if the
> code in subversion isn't the latest.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Lee Meador a écrit :
> > To make it work the way I hear you wanting, it looks like you need
> > something
> > that notices the changed Subverions revision number and knows the last
> > revision number that continuum built. Then it causes Continuum to build
> the
> > version after the last one built and repeats builds after that of each
> > subversion version number up to the current one.
> >
> > I'm not sure if you can tell Continuum to build a particular Subversion
> > version number.
> >
> > I'm not sure what would happen if a lot of little changes get made all
> at
> > once. There could be quite a backlog of builds to do.
> >
> > It would even build a version where the only change was to add a space
> in a
> > pom, for example, or other change that wouldn't effect the build outcome
> at
> > all. Of course, all you would lose is the time.
> >
> > -- Lee
> >
> > On 6/13/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/13/06, Baron Reznik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 18:28 +0200, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> >> > > On 6/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > I know I'd find this useful as well, for several reasons:
> >> > > > -If you simply let continuum build every 5 mins, there could
> >> potentially be more than 1 commit during that time, and you would be
> >> building multiple revisions worth of changes. Ideally, you would want
> to
> >> build once/revision so if the build breaks, you know which commit
> >> broke it.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > You are not considering here the time that it takes to build the
> >> project.
> >> > > a commits
> >> > > continuum starts building
> >> > > b commits
> >> > > continuum can't start building, busy
> >> > > c commits
> >> > > continuum can't start building, busy
> >> > > continuum finishes building
> >> > > continuum starts building b and c changes
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > ^^^ That's exactly what I'm talking about. Sometimes it will build 1
> >> > revision, and other times 2 or more revisions could be mixed into one
> >> > build. I'd like to avoid that.
> >> >
> >>
> >> You can't avoid this with a post commit hook
> >>
> >> > >
> >> > > > -The continuum server would not be making as many hits to the svn
> >> server. If you're building dozens and dozens of projects, this adds up
> >> when
> >> it's once every 5 mins.
> >> > >
> >> > > I don't realy know what is the overhead of getting the revision
> >> number
> >> > > to check for changes but shouldn't be heavy at all
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > I don't know how you verify this, but I got the impression that
> >> > continuum was performing a 'svn update' (for subversion, anyways),
> >> > which, could be rather heavy depending on how your repository is laid
> >> > out. I'm not sure offhand if subversion provides a more efficient way
> >> > though.
> >> >
> >>
> >> svn info gives you the local revision
> >> svn info URL gives you the remote one
> >>
> >> conitnuum may be improved to use this instead of a checkout if it does
> >> not currently
> >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If you got rather fancy, it would sure be nice to have the commit
> >> check if there were new projects added, and automagically add them to
> >> continuum as well.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Carlos Sanchez
> >> > > > Sent: Thu 6/8/2006 1:54 PM
> >> > > > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> >> > > > Subject: Re: Subversion post-commit hook
> >> > > >
> >> > > > why do you need that, setting a short period like 5 min is not
> >> enough?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 6/8/06, Chris Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > > > We'd like to trigger Continuum builds upon developer commits in
> >> > > > > Subversion. It sounds like to do so we need to develop an
> >> xml-rpc
> >> > > > > client.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Has anyone developed a post-commit hook into Continuum from
> >> Subversion?
> >> > > > > Is there related documentation available?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > -Chris
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> > > > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
> >> contain
> >> > > > > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its
> >> subsidiaries and affiliated
> >> > > > > entities, that may be
> >> confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> >> > > > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> >> individual
> >> > > > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> >> recipient,
> >> > > > > and have received this message in error, please immediately
> >> return
> >> this
> >> > > > > by email and then delete it.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> >> > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> >> > > > -- The Princess Bride
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> >> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> >> -- The Princess Bride
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
-- Lee Meador
Sent from gmail. My real email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
