only one required, but all the others as optional
On 6/20/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's what the Juergen had to say:
<quote>
We tried a number of different jar file arrangements and eventually went
with the all-encompassing spring.jar for 2.0 M5, as alternative to a
combination of fine-grained jars from the "modules" directory. The mock jar
is still separate, sitting alongside either spring.jar or a combination of
fine-grained jars. The same applies to the jar that contains the AspectJ
aspects.
The line between what's within spring.jar and what's a separate jar was just
becoming too arbitrary, with the various O/R Mapping options on the one hand
and the various web integration options on the other hand. Hence, the
current plan is so stick with the "one-big-jar versus
many-fine-grained-jars" strategy for 2.0 RC1 and final again (just like we
had it in Spring 1.2.x).
</quote>
Because of this, it seems to me that spring-2.0-m5 should have a POM
at http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/2.0-m5/
with a single dependency - commons-logging. True?
Matt
On 6/19/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hehe, I think you have wrote to the wrong list! you have to ask Spring
> guys they are the official ones
>
> and M5 is not missing dependencies, it doesn't have pom at all!
>
> You can vote at
> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-1484
>
> I'm opening another thread to poing Maven users there
>
> On 6/19/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The spring.jar for 2.0 M4 didn't include
> > org.springframework.orm.hibernate*. The one for M5 does. The
> > spring-hibernate3.jar for M4 included Hibernate dependencies, the one
> > for M5 does not. Which is the correct way moving forward? Which way
> > will it be in 2.0 Final?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
