You're both very welcome. The only place I'd seen the <activeByDefault> tag before was in the settings reference, which as I said was why I did it that way. Once I started looking (and knew what to look for), I found a couple of examples but I gave up early on for some reason.
Let's hope anybody else having this problem finds our posts and gets by easily. That, and maybe we should post some documentation patches. :) Maybe that'll be a weekend project for me. On 7/19/06, Mark Hewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/19/06, Max Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mykel, > > I am glad you posted your experience! > > I tried an empty <activeByDefault/> the same way you did and assumed > that it didn't work. > > I ended up listing the profile I wanted active in <activeProfiles>. And > then setup an example settings.xml for the rest of my team to active the > profile this way. So now my whole team is missing out on the simpler > <activeByDefault> tag. > > If I had only known... :-) > > -Max > And I did exactly the same thing! I wonder if at some point one of the examples had the empty <activeByDefault/> tag? Anyway, my thanks also to Mykel for showing the solution. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Never wear anything that panics the cat. -- P. J. O'Rourke
