Does anybody has an opinion on that? 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>e.org 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>en.apache.org] 
>Sent: 13 July, 2006 23:07
>To: users@maven.apache.org
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: maven-source-plugin 2.0.1 vs. 2.0 - changed behaviour
>
>Hi maven2 knowledged people,
> 
>I finally discovered why my homemade plugin doesn't work 
>anymore since some time. It's defining it's own lifecycle 
>where it first generates sources (in the generates-sources 
>phase) and then uses the maven-source-plugin in the packaging 
>phase to jar the gerated sources.
> 
>Can it be that the 2.0.1 version of the maven-source-plugin 
>does call the generate-sources phase internally? I think so, 
>because the phase is executed twice (and is failing for the 
>second time, i.e. when it's invoked from maven-source-plugin). 
>Can I disable that somewhere? Or do I have to stick with 
>version 2.0 of the plugin?
> 
>Thanks for your comments.
>Andreas Ebbert-Karroum
>  Senior Software Design Engineer - Nokia Networks Services / 
>Middleware
>  phone: +49-211-94123928, fax: +49-211-94123838
>  Heltorfer Straße 1, 40472 Düsseldorf, Germany 
>
>
>________________________________
>
>This message is confidential. If you have received this 
>message in error, please delete it from your system. You 
>should not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents 
>to any other person. Internet communications are not secure 
>and therefore Nokia GmbH does not accept legal responsibility 
>for the contents of this message as it has been transmitted 
>over a public network. Thank you. 
>
>Nokia GmbH, Nokia Networks is a German Company. Further 
>information about the Company is available from its principal 
>offices at Heltorferstrasse 1, D-40472, Düsseldorf, Germany 
>and from the website at http://www.nokia.com/ 
>________________________________
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to