On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
my IDE.
jetty6 was renamed to jetty
It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
jetty:run when overlaying wars.
jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
war:inplace.
Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
is a good one?
appfuse2
- data
- common (model objects, interfaces)
- hibernate
- ibatis
- service
- web
- common
- common-war
- jsf
- jsf-war
- spring
- spring-war
- struts
- struts-war
- tapestry
- tapestry-war
I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
the war-overlay feature.
looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
Thanks,
Matt
>
> On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > (jetty) mailing list?
> >
> > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > bunch of files in it by default.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
