This may or not be a bug in the code (though I think the nullpointerexception
is clearly a bug from a user perspective - the failure should be more
informative - I've submitted a bug about it in JIRA, MRELEASE-167).

But if it isn't a bug, it should be more clearly described in the online
documentation.  This was an unnecessary waste of several hours, and I can
see from the other posts to the nabble forum, I wasn't the first.  I'll
submit a JIRA issue about this.

     Cheers,
     Harold



Hi,

I've found the reason why release:prepare fails for my project (it's  
an issue from Chas Douglass' post).
The scm section of my pom.xml was like this:
   <scm>
     <developerConnection>scm:svn:file:///usr/local/svnrep/xxx/trunk</ 
developerConnection>
   </scm>

I downloaded the release plugin sources and checked the write method  
in the PropertiesReleaseConfigurationStore.java class (this is where  
the process fails).
And I've found, that the method assumes that a <connection> tag is  
mandatory inside the scm section.
So the (temporary?) solution to this problem is to include both, the  
<connection>  and <developerConnection>  in the scm section, eg:
   <scm>
     <connection>scm:svn:file:///usr/local/svnrep/xxx/trunk</connection>
     <developerConnection>scm:svn:file:///usr/local/svnrep/xxx/trunk</ 
developerConnection>
   </scm>

I think that this is a bug. The <developerConnection> should be  
mandatory, but <connection>  should be optional, because the  
<developerConnection> is needed to perform
the release:perform. Or at least the process should stop and an  
apropriate message should send to console.
If it's a bug, I will file a JIRA issue and send a patch.
What do you think?

Regards,
Jakub


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Release-Failure-tf1624778.html#a6574232
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to