I'd imagine you could omit both, but I'm not currently doing that. Version I'm sure would flow through, and I'd expect scope would as well.
Wayne On 10/11/06, Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can I omit the version and scope as they are already defined in the master pom.xml in DependancyManagement? Or did that not work? On 10/11/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure, here's my war and ear pom (not all of them, but some of the > dependencies)... > > war/pom.xml > <dependency> > <groupId>geronimo-spec</groupId> > <artifactId>geronimo-spec-jms</artifactId> > <version>1.1-rc4</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>geronimo-spec</groupId> > <artifactId>geronimo-spec-ejb</artifactId> > <version>2.1-rc4</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId> > <artifactId>servlet-api</artifactId> > <version>2.3</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>taglibs</groupId> > <artifactId>standard</artifactId> > <version>1.1.2</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > <exclusions> > <exclusion> > <artifactId>taglibs</artifactId> > <groupId>standard</groupId> > </exclusion> > </exclusions> > <optional>true</optional> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId> > <artifactId>jstl</artifactId> > <version>1.1.2</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > <exclusions> > <exclusion> > <artifactId>javax.servlet</artifactId> > <groupId>jstl</groupId> > </exclusion> > </exclusions> > <optional>true</optional> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>log4j</groupId> > <artifactId>log4j</artifactId> > <version>1.2.12</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > <exclusions> > <exclusion> > <artifactId>log4j</artifactId> > <groupId>log4j</groupId> > </exclusion> > </exclusions> > <optional>true</optional> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>quartz</groupId> > <artifactId>quartz</artifactId> > <version>1.5.1</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > <exclusions> > <exclusion> > <artifactId>quartz</artifactId> > <groupId>quartz</groupId> > </exclusion> > </exclusions> > <optional>true</optional> > </dependency> > > > ear/pom.xml > <dependency> > <groupId>geronimo-spec</groupId> > <artifactId>geronimo-spec-jms</artifactId> > <version>1.1-rc4</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>geronimo-spec</groupId> > <artifactId>geronimo-spec-ejb</artifactId> > <version>2.1-rc4</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId> > <artifactId>servlet-api</artifactId> > <version>2.3</version> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>taglibs</groupId> > <artifactId>standard</artifactId> > <version>1.1.2</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId> > <artifactId>jstl</artifactId> > <version>1.1.2</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>log4j</groupId> > <artifactId>log4j</artifactId> > <version>1.2.12</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>quartz</groupId> > <artifactId>quartz</artifactId> > <version>1.5.1</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > </dependency> > > > HTH. > Wayne > > On 10/11/06, Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can I see your war pom.xml to see how you excluded everything? > > > > > > > > On 10/11/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I generally only allow my JARs to be placed in my EAR lib to reduce > > > the overall size of my EAR and eliminate duplication of code (I'm > > > using Oracle OAS 10.1.2 right now). But you'll need to check your > > > container's documentation and perhaps the J2EE Specs to see what works > > > for you. > > > > > > Currently this requires me to declare and then simultaneously exclude > > > most every dependency in my WAR pom, and also declare them in the EAR. > > > So not a lot of fun from a "managing your poms" perspective. > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > On 10/11/06, Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have many LIB's that are in both my war and my ear. Is this > correct or > > > > should they just be in the ear? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > DJ MICK > > > > http://www.djmick.com > > > > http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks > > > > DJ MICK > > http://www.djmick.com > > http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Thanks DJ MICK http://www.djmick.com http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
