This was recently discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are welcome to read that discussion and perhaps even send a response if you'd like. I'd recommend that you continue the discussion in that same thread rather than starting another.
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:09:29 +0200 Subject: Dep to same artifact in different versions Wayne On 5/8/07, David Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using a particular library and they've just released a new version. The new library's API has changed significantly enough that the publisher has changed all of the package names and made it possible for a project to use both the old and new versions of the library side-by-side as the project migrates from the old to the new version. That works great for the library, but there isn't a way (or is there?) to tell Maven that it should actually use both versions of the library. So the question is this: does this come up enough that Maven should support this use case? An obvious work-around would be to copy the old artifact to a different artifactId so Maven treats it like a completely different library. This would work unless the project wants to be deployed beyond the availability of the repository containing the copy of the old artifact. Is it reasonable to expect the publisher to deploy the copy of the old artifact to a different artifactId? (In my case, the publisher thinks Maven should just support using two versions side-by-side.) How often does this sort of thing happen at all? ..David..
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]