On 8/24/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Barrie,
>
> Sorry I missed your earlier post. I think this is a valid use case.
>
> With the changes I'm making for MRM-462, it should be again possible
> to proxy file:// repositories, though I think even with the current
> release you could configure the available http:// URL for each of your
> repositories. The downside is that you need to configure a "remote"
> repository that corresponds to each of your internal ones.

remote repo is a valid workaround.

My internal repositories are already exposed via http.

Thanks

Reply via email to