On 8/24/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Barrie, > > Sorry I missed your earlier post. I think this is a valid use case. > > With the changes I'm making for MRM-462, it should be again possible > to proxy file:// repositories, though I think even with the current > release you could configure the available http:// URL for each of your > repositories. The downside is that you need to configure a "remote" > repository that corresponds to each of your internal ones.
remote repo is a valid workaround. My internal repositories are already exposed via http. Thanks