I owe you one, Julian! The only thing wrong in Dennis' suggestion is that
it's exactly what I wanted to avoid - and what others probably would like to
avoid as well. Not that writing/compiling plugin is that much work, but
there's overhead in maintaining, deploying and versioning anything you have
to do yourself.
Kalle
On 8/29/07, Julian Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems reasonable. Look for it in 0.9.6.
>
> J
>
> On 28-Aug-07, at 3:00 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>
> > I've been amazed myself by the fact that the plugin (nor any other
> > one)
> > doesn't just provide a straight-up timestamp. buildnumber plugin
> > comes the
> > closest, but if you want to use both svn version number and a
> > timestamp, you
> > are frustratingly out of luck. Looking at buildnumber plugin
> > source, it'd be
> > super simple to add the timestamp as different property rather than
> > re-using
> > buildNumber. Hey Julian, any chance you could add ${timestamp} in
> > the next
> > version? I'm sure a lot of people would be grateful for this, so
> > that not
> > everyone would need to create weird hacks or implement their plugin
> > versions
> > just for this.
> >
> > Kalle
> >
> >
> > On 8/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm using the maven-buildnumber--plugin version 0.9.5
> >> It works but I would like to have both a timestamp and the build
> >> number
> >> from svn?
> >> Is this possible?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Gunnar
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Julian Wood
> Web, E-Mail, and Middleware Services
> University of Calgary Information Technologies,
> 2500 University Drive, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
> (403) 220-5868
>
>
