As mentioned, please include an IT with those instructions. If you get
us this by midweek, then we will definitely try to include it. At this
point, issues not scheduled for 2.0.9 without an IT test attached have
almost no chance of making it in.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 3:43 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: when will maven 2.0.9 be officially released?

Will do, if I can get some more time. If so, I will open a new related
bug or attempt to reopen one if I can pinpoint where in the source it
goes wrong. Thanks


On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I agree with Wendy.
>
>  You could also whip up a test case using these instructions:
>
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Creating+a+Maven+Integration+Test
>  as it'll give you a head start on being included in a release.
>
>  - Brett
>
>
>
>  On 03/03/2008, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Robinson
>  >
>  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > > No, 2.0.7 and 2.0.8 both do not work with JDK 1.6 because of this
bug.
>  >  >  2.1 fixed the problem. The earlier releases ran plugins and
plugin
>  >  >  executions in random order due to improper use of HashMap.
>  >  >
>  >  >  It is really easy to reproduce the problem. I had 3 executions
of the
>  >  >  maven SQL plugin and they ran out of order in JDK 1.6 and are
fine in
>  >  >  2.1. JDK 1.5 worked fine as well, so it definitely seems like
it was a
>  >  >  collections use bug.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Perhaps MNG-2784 was only a partial fix?
>  >
>  >
>  > No idea, but it looks like all the related issues are closed.  It's
>  >  likely nothing further will happen unless an issue gets reopened
or a
>  >  new issue is raised.  (It's also possible there's a technical
reason
>  >  the fix for 2.1 can't be backported to 2.0.)
>  >
>  >  Have you tried 2.0.9-SNAPSHOT?  If you can't find an open issue
that
>  >  describes the problem you're still having with 2.0.x, I'd open
>  >  another.  Worst case, it might get closed as WONTFIX with an
>  >  explanation...
>  >
>  >
>  >  --
>  >
>  > Wendy
>  >
>  >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  --
>
> Brett Porter
>  Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to