Hi Dan, Dan Tran wrote: > correction, there is no GNU license type, but LGPL, however the > question still valid. > > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello every thing, >> >> I am about make a bundle request to upload izpack's >> standalone-compiler.jar to repo. >> Even thou izpack is apache 2.0 license type, but the request upload >> jar contains a other jar files, >> and one of those is GNU type. >> >> So the question here, how do we set up pom.xml file regarding the >> license element? >> >> What is the impact for commercial applications which use >> izpack-maven-plugin ( in mojo's sandbox) to produce installers. >> >> thoughts?
I had a similar issue bundling Xpp3 and I simply added multiple licenses: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/xpp3/xpp3/1.1.4c/xpp3-1.1.4c.pom - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
