On Thursday 11 December 2008 Brian E. Fox wrote: > Please try it out and see if we have any remaining regressions over > 2.0.9.
No problems with 2.0.10-RC5 here. However, the versioning seems strange: some months ago i tested 2.0.10-RC9, now I'm testing 2.0.10-RC5 which is newer. I know that the RC9 became 2.1.0-M1 and this one is another branch, but still the versioning of the RCs might be a bit confusing. hth, - martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
