Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:20 PM To: Stephen Connolly Cc: Maven Users List; u...@mojo.codehaus.org; Maven Developers List; d...@mojo.codehaus.org Subject: Re: versions:analyze
5. When locked snapshots are in use ( i.e. 1.0-20090406.102308-2 and not 1.0-SNAPSHOT ) (minor warning) 2009/4/6 Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> > 3. when the same plugin is specified in multiple projects in the reactor, > using different versions (severe warning fir 2.x minor for 3.x) > > 4. when reporting plugins specify a different version from build plugins > > Sent from my [rhymes with myPod] ;-) > > > On 4 Apr 2009, at 22:30, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, >> >> ok so I'm working on a new goal for the versions plugin, analyze (and an >> associated report analysis-report) >> >> I would like this goal to highlight potential issues with respect to >> versions.... >> >> first problem I see is: >> >> 1. Referencing a reactor project as a plugin or plugin dependency >> consumed later in the reactor (since plugins must be class-loaded prior to >> starting the build life cycle, and the artifacts will not be available until >> after the package phase at least >> >> Anyone any other suggestions for possible problems (which are to do with >> versions and the reactor) >> >> 2. Using a dependency which is produced by the reactor, but not using the >> version from the reactor (this is more of a warning than a problem as I can >> see times when you might want to do this) >> >> Oh, and by the way, these will not fail the build, that's the job of the >> enforcer plugin... I want this report to help steer people towards best >> practice >> >> -Stephen >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
