Just created http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4156
Regards, Stevo. On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Mark Hobson <markhob...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/5/11 Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu>: > > At face value the logic seems to make sense, but I haven't thought > through > > all the ramifications. I thought Mark Hobson mentioned some cases where > the > > opposite was desired. At this point your best bet is to prepare a > proposal > > on http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/User+Proposals with an > > associated Jira and then start building some consensus around the > changes. > > > > Work in this area for 3.x is nearing so now's a good time to create the > > proposal. > > I'm all in favour of local test scope not overriding transitive > compile scope. I've just this second been bitten by this again and > had to mangle the pom to workaround it. Local dependencies shouldn't > have any higher precedence that transitive ones; if you want to force > a dependency's version and/or scope, then dependency management should > be used for this purpose. > > The compile/test runtime/provided scope separation sounds interesting > but I'd need some time to think it through. > > Let's at least get this first issue in JIRA before it gets lost, has > anything been raised? > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >
