Like Brian, I expected this would work right in 2.0.10 and 2.1.0, so I'm a bit surprised it didn't work.
Having said that, let me remind you what I said earlier... ;-) > This just won't work at all, at least not consistently. Build a > different jar containing just the classes you DON'T override, and > depend on it instead. I've just run into too many odd problems as a result of trying to override classes like this that I simply refuse to go this route at this point. Making sure your jars are in the right order in Maven plus your Web container and any other environments you may use them in is just too much work when you can "solve" this pretty easily with your own build of the jar minus certain classes. Wayne On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu> wrote: > I expected it would, yes. > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Brendan Haverlock > <brend...@mirthcorp.com>wrote: > >> I am using 2.1.0, and it doesn't seem to make a difference which order I >> put >> them in. Based on what you said, shouldn't this be working in my version? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brendan Haverlock > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
