> Soren, would you care to share your views on this?
I wish to use Mbuni.
It is necessary to do non-realized opportunities.
It will be difficult to me to integrate own code without your help.
Will correctly join developers.
> MM7 is in the works. Well, it's on my todo list. I haven't actually
> gotten started on it, but I've figured out how to do it, and it should
Now I above it actively work.
MM7 sends messages under report HTTP.
There is a ready library for reception of the attached files.
For example: http://www.boutell.com/cgic/
There is less than work with use httpd
> I'm planning on implementing MM7 by checking if mms_frombinary returns
> NULL and if it does, I'll call a newly created function called
> mms_fromsoap which does the same thing as mms_frombinary and
> mms_frommime only extracting the message from the soap package.
If you have charged to make something to me, I can
> The big hurdle, obviously, is coding mms_fromsoap. If anyone is in the
> mood, feel free to take a stab at it. I probably won't have time to look
> at it for a week or so.
Allow to make it to me?
> I tend to disagree with this approach. mmsproxy should remain for the
> mm1 interface alone. You should build a different interface which
> receives SOAP or EAIF (I think both should be done right off and
> distinguished by called URL).
Yes, yes, CGI rules :-)!
> Lets exhaust the discussion here or offline before you make any changes.
I shall formulate the offers and I shall send for discussion
Ok?
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users_mbuni.org
