We are aware of a number of operators using Mbuni in this way, it all
depends how much traffic you will be handling. You would also do well
to use the PostgreSQL queue driver instead of the file-based one, as
this makes queue management faster and easier/cleaner.
You can also of course speak to the Trained Professionals at
Skycore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) if some hand-holding is desired.
P.
On Aug 06, 2008, at 12:53, Real World wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Just a small question .
Say we going to put mbuni for in front of high load like what mobile
operator receiving. Does mbuni handles that load very well ? or is
there any modification we have to do for mbuni source codes ??
----- Original Message ----
From: P. A. Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Real World <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: MBUNI - MMS <Users@mbuni.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 2:56:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] Freedom of MBUNI
Mbuni does not depend on Kannel as the WAP Gateway, so yes you can
do as you suggest below.
Paul.
On Aug 06, 2008, at 12:01, Real World wrote:
Hi ,
Is MBUNI directly depend on kannel WAP gateway ? Just for Fetch
MSISDN for all mms request do we have to have kannel wap gateway
infront of MBUNI ?
For insrtance if we have different wap gateway from a different
vendor , can't we use MBUNI as a MMS gateway since those WAP
gateways are parsing MSISDN same as what kannel wap gateway does?
Many Thanks
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@mbuni.org
http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@mbuni.org
http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users
