> First, I really appreciate your work on the framework, it's very easy to > work with and has really cool features, but I have to say that it is bad > that the out-of-the-box performance of MINA is so poor.
Keep in mind that the way you used MINA is really very specific. I don't have such performance simply because I never transfer such big messages. If you consider that messages that will be exchanged never exceed a few kilobytes, then performances are also excellent. This simple > performance comparison test should always be verified throughout MINA > releases. > Second, why mass around with the receive buffer anyway if the user didn't > explicitly wants to? let the OS manage it... AFAIK, this is a configurable option, and if we don't configure it before connecting the socket, then the RCV buffer size will never grow bigger than 64K. So what should we do ? Set the buffer size to 2Gb ?. Also consider that I'm not 100% sure of the consequecnes of such a change. Maybe it's totally harmless. > Can you please release a patched version of MINA 1.1.7 with a fix? If you can provide a patch for 2.0§RC1, then we can fore sure apply it. I'm afraid that 1.1.7 is a dead branch at this point... Anyway, feel free to send the patch, I don't know if someone has some time to release a 1.1.8 -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
