2 CPUs of the following configuration(Intel Dual Core XEON Processor 3.3 Ghz
)

Using thread dump on tomcat java process is a bit risky for us as it will
bring down all our web services.

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Ashish <[email protected]> wrote:

> How many CPU's/Cores on the machines?
>
> Try taking a few Thread dumps and see what's taking up the CPU.
>
> Alternatively, if its not a production App, go for profiling and see
> what's going on inside.
>
> thanks
> ashish
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Kumar Abhishek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using MINA for client-server based communication on my Centos
> machine
> > both of which reside on same machine. The architecture is the following:
> >
> > Client has a single SocketConnector and manages a pool of active
> IOSession
> > objects which can be utilized by any incoming request. This
> SocketConnector
> > is invoked by tomcat once HTTP POST request comes to a particular url
> hosted
> > on the machine. The client picks up an active session and fires the
> request
> > to the socket server. I am using executor Executors.newCachedThreadPool()
> so
> > that the request doesn't execute on IO thread.
> >
> > On the server end I have a socket server which uses a executor to process
> > incoming IO request and send back response. The typical request
> processing
> > involves db queries, sending sms on smpp server and returning back the
> > result to the client. Typically this request processing can take upto
> 40secs
> > to finish up(yeah I know its slow as sms sending and delivery report is
> to
> > be proceesed)
> >
> > What I observe is the following even on a single request the CPU usage of
> > tomcat java process shoots up very high which is very worrying given the
> > system is expected to see more traffic in coming days. I have also tried
> to
> > forcefully bring down the request processing time to 3secs by ignoring a
> few
> > steps just to diagnose the problem, however there is no improvement, its
> > just that cpu shoots for a smaller period i.e. from 40 secs to 3 secs.
> Any
> > suggestions will be highly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Best Regards,
> > Abhishek
> >
>
>
>
> --
> thanks
> ashish
>
> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>

Reply via email to