> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Namens Rudie Ekkelenkamp > Verzonden: donderdag 11 november 2004 12:48 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values > > > Hi Ernst, > > I looked into your model and it is just fine (nice model > though!). I'm afraid you ran into a nasty bug. I sent a patch > for this bug as an attachment. I also uploaded the patch to > mmapps. The bug was in the code that sorted the > modelelements. This patch no longer sorts the builders, but > at least generates them. > > The patch actually shows you how you can easily adjust the > templates if you need to change them. In the > modules/uml2mmbase-core/templates directory you can put all > templates that you need to change (the can be extracted from > the uml2mmbase-core.jar file).
thanks for the help, but i'm not quite there yet. first, i had to make a directorystructure like uml2mmbase1.7\src\andromda-mmbase\templates where i had to put mmbase-search.vsl to get rid of an error. but i don't think the app uses the new version of mmbase-application.vsl (the behavour is still the same). i did some playing around, but probalby don't get the path right. some things i tried: uml2mmbase1.7\src\andromda-mmbase\modules\uml2mmbase-core\templates\mmba se-application.vsl uml2mmbase1.7\src\modules\uml2mmbase-core\templates\mmbase-application.v sl uml2mmbase1.7\modules\uml2mmbase-core\templates\mmbase-application.vsl can you tell me what i'm doing wrong? thanks, Ernst > > Hope this helps, > > Cheers. > > Rudie. > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ernst > > Bunders > > Verzonden: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:27 AM > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Namens Rudie Ekkelenkamp > > > Verzonden: woensdag 10 november 2004 12:55 > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values > > > > > > > > > Hi Ernst, > > > > > > You can use as many diagrams as you like. It's only the model > > > that counts. > > > > That's what I thought. > > > > >But all model elements will be used, so if that > > > is not your intention, that might be the cause of the > > > problem... > > > > Well, the problem is that for all the builders in my model the app > > creates builderfiles and wizards. Allso in APPLICATION.xml both the > > neededreldeflist and allowedrelationlist are complete. Only the > > neededbuilderlist is missing about half the builders. There are no > > error messages either. > > > > > Are you using mmbase 1.6 or 1.7. The default is > > > 1.7 now, so that might be a problem? > > > > Nop. I'm using 1.7. > > > > So. Is there anything you can think about? Is it possible > that due to > > some error in the xmi file the creation of the neederbuilderlist is > > running into a problem? Or is it possible to get more > verbose logging > > from uml2mmbase? I must say I'm a bit anxious about this.. For > > completeness I include the zuml file. > > > > Regards, > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > Rudie. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Ernst Bunders > > > > Verzonden: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:45 PM > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Namens Rudie Ekkelenkamp > > > > > Verzonden: woensdag 10 november 2004 12:09 > > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ernst, > > > > > > > > > > I just created a uml2mmbase category, so you can add the RFE > > > > > there. Actually, there is also a UML2MMbase forum. I > think that > > > > > would be the preferred way to discuss UML2MMbase > features. The > > > > > mmbase users mailing list is probably not the best place to > > > > > discuss this? > > > > > > > > > > Rudie. > > > > > > > > On the other hand, you need to log in to post to the > forum and it > > > > is not exactly thriving. > > > > So I will risk obusing this list some more. > > > > It seems I have a problem. I have made a nice model with > > mmbase2uml. > > > > Now I am making some changes and try to convert it to an > > > > mmbase app. All > > > > goes well except not alle builders are listed in the > > > > neededbuilderlist. > > > > I do user a number of diagrams, assuming that that is ok. > > > Am I right? > > > > Are there other tips you could give me to trouble > shoot? Regards, > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Ernst Bunders > > > > > > Verzonden: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 11:55 AM > > > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wouldn't it be nice to add some categories to the RFE > > > > > section for the > > > > > > project? Like for every app in the project. Otherwise it > > > > > might get a > > > > > > bit messy > > > > > > > > > > > > ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Namens Rudie Ekkelenkamp > > > > > > > Verzonden: woensdag 10 november 2004 11:28 > > > > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Onderwerp: RE: Uml2mmbase: default field values > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ernst, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is currently not possible in UML2MMBase to specify > > > a default > > > > > > > value. But in UML you can specify an initial value > > > which could > > > > > > > be used to model de default value. So if it is > > possible with > > > > > > > edit wizards, it can be possible with UML2MMBase. > > > Please add a > > > > > > > RFE at mmapps.sourceforge.net for this feature. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FYI, I'm currently working on supporting the > > > MagicDraw UML tool > > > > > > > (which in my opinion is even better than Poseidon > UML), for > > > > > > > which also a community edition is available.. The > > > next release > > > > > > > of UML2MMBase will have this support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rudie Ekkelenkamp. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Michiel Meeuwissen > > > > > > > > Verzonden: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 11:09 AM > > > > > > > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Onderwerp: Re: Uml2mmbase: default field values > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kees Jongenburger wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:35:47 +0100, Ernst Bunders > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to set default values for > > fields? I can't > > > > > > > > find it in the > > > > > > > > > > document > > > > > > > > > This is not possible in mmbase , unless you create you > > > > > > > own builders > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Indeed, but he referred to UML2MMBase in which indeed > > > > > it would be > > > > > > > > imagineable, because it also generates > > editwizards, IIRC. In > > > > > > > > Editwizard XML's you can specify defaults. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Michie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' > > > > > > > > Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () > > > > > > > > +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
