_________________________________________________________________ Dr JW Harley Senior Technologist E-lab, IT Services Department, University of Warwick, Coventry UK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.warwick.ac.uk/staff/J.W.Harley/
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/05 02:19AM >>> > Yes, I was thinking about that, but it seemed a bit hacky to me - > especially since it depends on the order that the properties are set. You could always have ALL of the setters call your init method at the end, and have init return without action until all needed properties are present. It's not pretty but at least it's more robust. > Actually, you're right - having Spring manage it works, since it has > application scope anyway. > So if the scope had to be something more transient than application > scope, I would have to use the jsf-spring package? jsf-spring does allow you to use JSF scopes in Spring, yes. And it does work with MyFaces - as long as you take the broken faces-config.xml out of the jsf-spring.jar. Jon. On 6/16/05, Duncan Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David, Could you not do the initialision in the setter that is being > used to inject the Spring managed value? > The other option would be to let Spring manage this object instead as > you do have a lot more flexibilty there - however option 1 seems simpler > if it would work in this situation.. > > Duncan Mills > www.groundside.com/blog > > David Tashima wrote: > > >Hey everyone, > > > >I am integrating Spring into my JSF application, and had a question > >about the lifecycle of a JSF managed bean.I have a JSF managed bean that > >depends on a Spring managed bean. The > >problem is that I need to do some initialization on the bean after it > >has been created and *after the Spring Bean has been injected*. > > > >Is there any way to define an init() method that gets invoked by JSF > >after the properties have been set? > > > >I am using the OOTB JSF integration piece that comes w/ Spring (not > >the Spring-JSF project stuff... perhaps my problem is addressed > >there?) > > > >Thanks! > >Dave > > > > > >
