Looking forward to your contribution. Dennis is correct in pointing out that the patch should be for sandbox. Feel free to ask around on the dev list if you have questions regarding procedure, patching, etc.
sean On 8/25/05, Ken Weiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, great, I will get familiar with the sandbox, change my code to > follow the packages for tomahawk, and submit patches to JIRA. Looking > forward to participating... > > On 8/25/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Suggestion: Add an issue to JIRA (select "sandbox" as the component > > type.) This gives committers a chance to shout down any ideas they > > find completely objectionable so you don't waste your time (this is > > not one of those ideas btw.) > > > > Then provide a SVN patch and we'll add it to sandbox. Be prepared to > > provide documentation and a simple example (or add to an existing > > simple example) when appropriate. The docs and examples are now > > required for new tomahawk goodies. > > > > sean > > > > On 8/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Looks convenient Ken. Please post your code. I would like to see it, > > > even > > > if this does not make it to the issue tracker. > > > > > > Dennis Byrne > > > > > >
