That's a good point. If the *defaults* for t:convertDateTime (currently
s:convertDateTime) are different than f:convertDateTime then perhaps it
should have a different name, eg
t:convertLocalDateTime
or
t:altConvertDateTime
New functionality is expected, but operations inherited from the parent
tag working *differently* could well surprise people.
Regards,
Simon
Volker Weber wrote:
In case of dataTable the taglib docu says:
Extended data_table that adds some additional features to the standard
data_table ...
so you are right to expect this, but in general if there is no
significant difference there should no reason to have a component with
the same name in core and tomahwak (or anywhere else).
An if i decide to use the tomahawk one instead of the core one, i have
to know these differences.
Or in other words: if not just this known difference is the reason to
use the tomahawk component, there is no reason.
just my opinion :-)
Regards and good night
Volker
CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) wrote:
I *do* expect that <t:dataTable> is a version of <h:dataTable> with
additional functionality. I don't expect it to have different defaults
for borders or background color, for example.