No, you will always get the UINavigationMenuItem. On 2/8/06, Richard Frazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I used the daily from today and it is returning the value I was looking > for, but not the UINavigationMenuItem like I would expect. It's still > returning the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu. > > Should I be getting the UINavigationMenuItem when I am coding like you said > in example "a" below? > > > > From: Richard Frazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org> > > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:21:58 -0500 > > To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org> > > Subject: RE: JSCookMenu and <f:param> > > > > I actually had it like your example a, except instead of an "action", I > > defined and "actionListener". This is where the source component was the > > menu > > and not the UINavigationMenuItem, as I would have expected. I'll try it > > with > > the next nightly build and let you know how that works. > > > > thanks. > > Richard > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tue 2/7/2006 6:09 PM > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and <f:param> > > > > You can choose between 2 tags to create the menu tree: > > > > a) <t:navigationMenuItem itemLabel="..." action="..." /> > > This tag creates an UINavigationMenuItem component. Perfect, this one > > could be passed to the ActionListener > > > > b) <t:navigationMenuItems value="#{...}> > > where the value binds a List of NavigationMenuItem(s) (remember a > > NavigationMenuItem is not a component). As no component will be > > generated for a NavigationMenuItem in the render phase, the only > > component that can be passed to the ActionListener is the menu itself. > > > > Thomas > > > > On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thanks Thomas. I'll grab the nightly tomorrow and try it out. > >> > >> What do you mean that most of you are using the NavigationMenuItem(s) to > >> create the entire menu tree? Does that mean you aren't using the > >> jscookMenu > >> tag, but some other tag? Does this allow you to achieve the parameter > >> passing approach? > >> > >> If there is a best practice type of approach that I'm not using, I would > >> love to hear it. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Richard > >> > >> > >> > >>> From: Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org> > >>> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:49:18 +0100 > >>> To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org> > >>> Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and <f:param> > >>> > >>> ty richard - this is a bug. I just fixed this issue. The item's value > >>> will be returned again instead of the label. I think most of us are > >>> using NavigationMenuItem(s) to create the entire menu tree. > >>> NavigationMenuItem is not an UIComponent, that's why it can't be > >>> passed by the event. > >>> > >>> regards > >>> Thomas > >>> > >>> Regarding your question, why the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu is returned as > >>> source component. Well > >>> > >>> On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> Thanks for your response. I downloaded the nightly yesterday and am > >>>> seeing > >>>> strange behavior. > >>>> > >>>> I tried adding an action listener to the navigationMenuItem and the > >>>> event > >>>> I > >>>> get in my listener gives me the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu object as the > >>>> source > >>>> instead of the MenuItem itself, so I can't determine which item was > >>>> selected. The strange thing is that the getValue method of the > >>>> HtmlCommandJSCookMenu returns the label of the selected item. I hate to > >>>> have to switch on the label though, because it's bound to change. > >>>> > >>>> Is this working as intended? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Richard > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ________________________________ > >>>> From: Eduardo Dudu Ivan Pichler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org> > >>>> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:25:46 -0200 > >>>> To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org> > >>>> Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and <f:param> > >>>> > >>>> not. > >>>> You need to use the nightly build of navigationMenuItem, such has > >>>> actionListener feature. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 2/6/06, Richard Frazer < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Is <f:param> supported in tandem with jsookMenu/navigationMenuItem? If > >>>> not, > >>>> is there a way to achieve the same result? > >>>> > >>>> thanks. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Dudu > >>>> `P > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://www.irian.at > >>> > >>> Your JSF powerhouse - > >>> JSF Consulting, Development and > >>> Courses in English and German > >>> > >>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
