Which xml are you referring to? I should have been more specific. I was referring to serving xhtml pages. Hopefully that is what you were referring to as well.
Shawn -----Original Message----- From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:44 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: facelets & compilation In my tests, Facelets shows pages faster than JSPs, pre-compiled or not. The XML parse is extremely fast, and only happens once; thereafter regular execution is much faster than JSPs, as there is no need to recreate Tag objects or constantly set properties, etc. The only significant advantage JSPs have over Facelets is better tool support. -- Adam Winer JSF EG On 2/27/06, Garner, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If you go with the facelets approach don't you loose your advantage of > having a pre-compiled JSPs? > > As far as initial load time and just regular overhead of serving the page? > > > > Shawn > > > > **************************************************************************** > > This email may contain confidential > material. If you were not an intended recipient, > Please notify the sender and delete all copies. > We may monitor email to and from our network. > > *************************************************************************** > **************************************************************************** This email may contain confidential material. If you were not an intended recipient, Please notify the sender and delete all copies. We may monitor email to and from our network. ****************************************************************************
