Ok, I'll give that a go, thanks. Jim
-----Original Message----- From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2006 15:27 To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: A bunch of belated answers about ADF The simplest possible PhaseListener I can imagine is one that just does: processScope.put("a", "b"); ... that is, chucks some nonsense data on, and makes sure that the system always generates a new token for every request. That'd be enough to bypass the issue you're encountering. -- Adam On 2/28/06, James Moores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam, > > Thanks for getting around answering so many of our questions. I gave > up on the use of processScope in the end (and switched back to session > scopes), but I've kept access to all my properties abstracted so I can > easily switch back to processScopes if/when I can get one of the > suggested solutions to work. I started on the phaseListener idea but > quickly realized it would be a bit of a nightmare because each > initialization is page specific (and phaseListeners aren't), so I > might now give one of the other ideas a go. > > Thanks again to you (and all those others who gave advice on this > topic), > > Cheers, > > Jim > -- > Jim Moores, SmartSpread Ltd, UK. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 February 2006 21:21 > To: users@myfaces.apache.org > Subject: A bunch of belated answers about ADF > > <snip> > - "I use the ADF Faces 'Process scope' facility a great deal...." > > This was a problem with values disappearing from the process scope. > The code was relying on a dummy "get" method being triggered during > Render Response to do initialization. It does hit a limitation of our > processScope - it's not thrilled with being mutated during Render > Response.. Laurie Harper's suggestion of using Shale is a good one; > with JSF 1.2, a beforePhaseListener on the f:view would work well too. > You could hack around the processScope limitation by forcibly putting > something, anything, in the processScope before Render Response, so > we'll at least generate an ID correctly. > > <snip> > Regards, > Adam Winer >
