On 4/22/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you interested in reworking the patch? Now that we've refactored > we need a new one. I will get to it eventually but if you supply a > proper patch I will do it much quicker ;-)
Hey Sean, I've been waiting to deal with this issue (as well as the extended data table issue) for quite some time. You told me to hold off until you were done refactoring tree2, but you never seemed to get back to me on it :) At this point, our solution probably needs to create compatible setter/getters on the component, but to continue to use the same generic attributes internally to store the values for backwards compatibility. At some point down the road, we should internally stop supporting the generic attributes.
