There are some good reasons for not doing this. It was discussed extensively on the dev list for several months so I won't rehash the entire discussion here. These classes need to be shared between core and tomahawk since we don't want two maintain sets of source code. They need to have different namespaces so that tomahawk and core can be released independently of one another.
Sean On 6/2/06, Costa Basil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it would be better if the shared classes are distributed in a separate jar file to avoid the class duplication. It is confusing the way it is right now having the same classes in two separate distribution jar files. Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, I noticed there is a package that I couldn't find in the source code > and that is org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk. What's going on, why is this > package missing? Is it actually built by the build process? If yes, could > you please provide the information on how to create it? Good question. I created [1] today. If it is not clear enough, please ask and I'll add more content to it! -Matthias [1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Shared_-_impl_or_tomahawk __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
