FYI:

https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=161

On 4/26/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This isn't a very restrictive definition at all - if I want to
release a component library, I shouldn't have to release
two versions, one for JSF 1.1 and one for JSF 1.2;
and developers moving to JSF 1.2 shouldn't be forced
to wait until all their component providers have provided
new versions.

There is an extremely high bar set for breaking backwards
compatibility in EE.  This is both a blessing and a curse,
but it's the rule.

-- Adam


On 4/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> So by backward compatibility, you mean that people ought to be able to
> take
> >> a faces 1.2 jar, drop it into their application and it will run without
> >> recompiling the application code?
> >
> > Yep.  Or, rather, that you should take an application
> > built with JSF 1.1 or use a  component library built against
> > JSF 1.1, drop it into a appserver that contains JSF 1.2,
> > and run.
>
> Hmm. Seems an awfully restrictive definition of backwards compatibility to
> me. I still think that in this case, the API is broken, and ought to be
> fixed, even if it means breaking backwards compatibility. Sure, it's a good
> goal to make new versions backwards compatible, but it should never get in
> the way of fixing problems. Don't you think in this case it is better to
> get it right?
>
> --
> Colin Sharples
>
>
> CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information 
intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this message you are hereby  notified that any use, 
dissemination, distribution or reproduction  of this message is prohibited. If you 
have received this message in  error please notify Bank of New Zealand 
immediately.  Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual  
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Bank of New Zealand.
>



--
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Reply via email to