Ok, I'll think of something. I assume myfaces developers monitor this list as I might need some help with the source code.
Has anyone looked at how the reference implementation integrates with portlets? Does it at all, actually? Best, Bolerio -----Original Message----- From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 6:37 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: Portlet examples needed by portlet/MyFaces users I think Stan has moved on to other projects for now, and may not be monitoring this list. If you want to propose, discuss, and implement a specific alternative, that would be great! On 9/14/06, Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding portlets and myfaces integration, I noticed another "detail" > that will potentially become a serious headache: the FacesContext > instance is kept in the portlet session. So, if I have 10 portlets on a > page, I have 10 FacesContext instances per user eating up me server > memory. This is unacceptable from a performance perspective. Could Mr. > Stan Silvert (stated author of myfacesgenericportlet) explain the design > decision? Are there alternatives? > > Thanks, > Bolerio > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 6:48 PM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: Portlet examples needed by portlet/MyFaces users > > I'm sure it's possible. Facelets did it. I use jstl functions in my > pages under facelets. > > On 9/13/06, Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does anybody know whether it's possible and how to write a customer > > variable resolver for the standard implementation of JSTL? That'll > solve > > another problem with portlets: JSF correctly puts managed beans in a > > portlet session (via the external context I guess), but the JSTL EL > > looks at the "servlet level" so you can't access JSF managed beans > with > > JSTL. This has probably been discussed at length and probably there is > a > > standard solution and probably it'll be dealt with in the upcoming > > version of the specs, but in the meantime....? > > > > Thanks > > Bolerio > > >
