cool... bookmarked!

2007/5/30, Rudi Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Sammy,

I found a solution here:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5115563&messageID=9419018

The solution is

<t:messages showDetail="true" replaceIdWithLabel="true"/>

Thanks,
Rudi


On 5/30/07, ::SammyRulez:: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> see
> http://www.laliluna.de/javaserver-faces-message-resource-bundle-tutorial.html
>
> for some info about that..
>
> any way it seems to me that your problem is only with the
> requered=true validation.
>
> why not set required=false and add this type of validation in your
> custom - interationalized validator.
>
> I don't know if when required=false and content=null validation phase is 
skipped
>
> I hope it helps
>
>
> 2007/5/30, Rudi Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi Sammy,
> >
> > I can't show the message near the inputfield, so I have to use
> > <h:messaes/> which shows a list of all messages for the page. Thats
> > why the name of the field within the message is important.
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean by your second proposal. Which class
> > should I extend and where do I have to register a new messageloader?
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> > Rudi
> >
> > On 5/30/07, ::SammyRulez:: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I mean
> > >
> > > 1) cut DescrD from bundle so that message will be "value required"
> > > only in appropriate language (the message is near the field so that
> > > the field name is not really necessary to me)
> > >
> > > 2)extend message loader in order to translate upon a key/language
> > > dictionary a proper name for the fields (more difficult but better)
> > >
> > > 2007/5/30, Rudi Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Hi Sammy,
> > > >
> > > > by modifying the bundle, I can't change the parameter passed to the
> > > > message. If I for example have a input field like this:
> > > >
> > > > <h:input Text id="DescrD" required="true"
> > > > value="#{PriorityEditBean.priority.prioDescriptionD}"/>
> > > >
> > > > So the generated message is something like
> > > >
> > > > Validation error "DescrD": value required.
> > > >
> > > > The problem is the "DescrD" is shown in all languages in the message,
> > > > and this I can't change by modifying the bundle :(
> > > >
> > > > Do you have another idea?
> > > >
> > > > Thank a lot,
> > > > Rudi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/30/07, ::SammyRulez:: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > what about customize the bundle of messages?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2007/5/30, Rudi Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have the problem, that I can't show the messages generated by the
> > > > > > build in validation mechanism of my Faces because in all languages 
the
> > > > > > name of an input field shown in the message is the id of the
> > > > > > input field, and this id is not dynamic. So I can't change it for
> > > > > > different languages.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The idea is to write a validation method like validate Required() 
and
> > > > > > depending on the component for which this method is called, generate
> > > > > > the message on the fly in the right language. The problem is, that a
> > > > > > validation method is just called, if there is a input in the filed, 
so
> > > > > > I have to use the required-attribute. But this is exactly, what I 
want
> > > > > > to avoid :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My question: can I force myFaces to call a validation method, also 
if
> > > > > > the input field is empty?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks a lot,
> > > > > > Rudi
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ::Samples::
> > > > > http://www.kyub.com/blog/
> > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > La programmazione è per un terzo interpretazione e per due terzi 
ispirazione.
> > > > >  E per un terzo giustificazione
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ::Samples::
> > > http://www.kyub.com/blog/
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > La programmazione è per un terzo interpretazione e per due terzi 
ispirazione.
> > >  E per un terzo giustificazione
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> ::SammyRulez::
> http://www.kyub.com/blog/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> La programmazione è per un terzo interpretazione e per due terzi ispirazione.
>  E per un terzo mistificazione
>



--
::SammyRulez::
http://www.kyub.com/blog/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
La programmazione è per un terzo interpretazione e per due terzi ispirazione.
E per un terzo mistificazione

Reply via email to