Adam, Thanks for the info!
Since I'm using the trunk, the org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.faces.STATE is what needs to be sent (at least, that's what's listed in my CoreResponseStateManager class). So, I now have the GWT request send that variable set to its component's id. I.e., the GWT widget in the component tree looks like this: <UIGWTWidget id="j_id29" rendered="true" transient="false"/> When the GWT request is issued, then org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.faces.STATE=!j_id29 is sent. However, this causes an index out of bounds error in the StateManagerImpl class--apparently, it is looking for a string value that looks like: someId:anotherId Since the value I send does not have a colon in it, then I've confused it. I couldn't figure out what the StateManager is expecting, even after some searching around. As far as my requirements, all I really need is for just the GWT component to be constructed on the postback. So, how should I format the state string in the request so that trinidad / JSF will understand it? Thanks again for your help, --David --- Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Trinidad 1.2 code sends javax.faces.ViewState (the 1.2 spec > requires this), but the trunk doesn't, instead sending > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.faces.STATE. If you're using JSF 1.2, > you could (and should) use the Trinidad 1.2 code. > > -- Adam > > > > On 5/29/07, D. Cardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for your response, I looked into it and found out that when G4JSF > > builds its request, > it > > send the javax.faces.ViewState variable in the request. Do I need to have > > it send something > > different for Trinidad? > > > > --David > > > > --- Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If there's no tree, I suspect that the state parameter is > > > not getting submitted. Check the G4JSF code to see if > > > it has hardcoded a list of request parameters to submit. > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > On 5/29/07, D. Cardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'm using MyFaces Trinidad and am integrating the Google Web Toolkit > > > > (GWT) to work along > with > > > it. > > > > I am using the G4JSF project along with some of my own modifications. > > > > So far, everything > on > > > the > > > > client side is working just fine, but I am having difficulty > > > > communicating with the server > > > when > > > > the GWT fires an event. Since the G4JSF project works just fine > > > > without Trinidad, I > figured a > > > > little enlightenment on Trinidad's workings would be very helpful. > > > > > > > > Here's the part of the process that is having problems: > > > > > > > > 1. The G4JSF project latches correctly onto the GWT event, which is > > > > correctly parsed from > the > > > > client's request. > > > > > > > > 2. G4JSF implements a phase listener, which propagates the GWT event > > > > after the Restore > View > > > phase > > > > has completed. > > > > > > > > 3. After the restore view phase completes, the phase listener's code > > > > correctly runs, but > the > > > > component tree is not "restored". That is, there IS a view root > > > > available, but it has no > > > > children. So, when "invokeOnComponent" is called on the > > > > facesContext.getViewRoot(), the > GWT > > > event > > > > never makes it to the GWT component. Also, I noticed that the > > > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.context.AdfFacesPhaseListener.POSTBACK > > > > variable in the > > > request > > > > is set to 'false'. > > > > > > > > Now my questions: > > > > > > > > - Shouldn't the component tree be completely constructed by the end of > > > > the Restore View > phase? > > > > - If not, is there a better way to propagate the GWT event to a > > > > function in the backing > bean? > > > > - Since the G4JSF client-server communication works fine in JSF without > > > > Trinidad, how does > > > > Trinidad modify the process? > > > > > > > > Thanks for any help! > > > > > > > > --David Cardon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Choose > the > > > right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder > > > tool. > > > > http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Need > > a > vacation? Get great deals > > to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. > > http://travel.yahoo.com/ > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
