Well, we've got a lot of variables here. It's a little suspicious to me hearing that an Ajax4JSF filter is now required, when this behavior doesn't appear to be reproducing for other users of Trinidad 1.2.
I'd try, for example, the same page without Ajax4JSF installed - if that means taking Seam out of the picture for that one page, OK. I'd also try deploying the same app to Glassfish - if it reproduces there, then we know it's not JBoss specific. BTW, USE_APPLICATION_VIEW_CACHE=false is the default, so setting that won't change anything. Another random thing to try is setting org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CACHE_VIEW_ROOT to false. That will be a change from the default. It throws away an extremely valuable optimization, but it also might help point out where things are going wrong. -- Adam On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there anything I can do to help narrow this down? On 5/30/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hrm, that looks like the same version as Glassfish! I > didn't know they were using the RI. So scrap that theory! > It still *might* be something wrong in JBoss (maybe their > implementation of JspIdConsumer in the JSP engine?), > but this is more puzzling. > > -- Adam > > > On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Adam. > > > > Do you happen to know what version of JSF Glassfish is using? > > > > From jsf-api.jar that is with JBoss 4.2.0.GA, the manifest states: > > > > Manifest-Version: 1.0 > > Specification-Title: JavaServer Faces > > Created-By: 1.5.0_04-b05 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) > > Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.5 > > Implementation-Title: Sun Microsystems JavaServer Faces Implementation > > Specification-Vendor: JBoss (http://www.jboss.org/) > > Specification-Version: 1.2MR1 > > Implementation-Vendor-Id: com.sun > > Extension-Name: javax.faces > > Implementation-Version: 1.2_04-b10-p01 > > Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > Implementation-URL: http://www.jboss.org/ > > Cheers, > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > On 5/30/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I suspect that there's something wrong with > > > the implementation of JSF 1.2 used by JBoss, probably > > > in that implementation's UIComponentClassicTagBase > > > code or something similar. The behavior you're describing > > > doesn't occur with Glassfish. > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I have a project that is running Trinidad and I recently upgraded to > > JBoss > > > > 4.2.0.GA. As part of this upgrade I also migrated to JSF 1.2 (the > > latest > > > > Seam version requires me to do this). Ever since then, whenever I > > submit a > > > > form that fails validation, the form renders the correct validation > > messages > > > > but I get some weird rendering of the form. It's actually like the > > previous > > > > HTML doesn't get cleared and the new form + validation errors gets > > tacked > > > > onto the end - I'm literally seeing double. If I click my submit button > > > > again, then a third instance will be tacked onto the bottom, and so on. > > If > > > > at this point I simply refresh the page, then everything resets back to > > > > normal. If I use the application without causing validation errors then > > > > everything works as normal. I get the same behaviour on FireFox and IE > > and > > > > there are no exceptions in the logs. > > > > > > > > I tried updating the Trinidad build to > > trinidad-*-1.2-07-may-SNAPSHOT.jar, > > > > but to no avail. > > > > > > > > I eventually tracked the strange behaviour down to my usage of > > <trh:body>, > > > > if I use a vanilla body tag then the page duplication problem goes. > > > > However, I still get similar issues with <tr:commandLink> - the instance > > of > > > > the link is duplicated with each form submission that causes a > > validation > > > > error. Changing to <h:commandLink> again, resolves this issue. > > > > > > > > Has anyone come across this before? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > > > > >
