Hello Francisco,

Release 1.0.2 includes real AJAX already. For now, new features are always
mirrored in both JSF 1.1 and 1.2, matching with the last release number
digit. i.e. features in 1.0.2 can be also found in 1.2.2.


Regards,

~ Simon

On 8/22/07, Francisco Passos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Excellent!
>
> Will 1.0.3 include real AJAX like 1.2.1? Or AJAX is not intented to be a
> part of the JSF 1.1 branch?
>
> On 8/22/07, Andrew Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds great Adam
> >
> > Any idea on the time line of a 1.0.3 release?
> >
> > On 8/21/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just added:
> > >
> > > - PPR should be a good bit more efficient, as most input + output
> > >   components will not render anything unless they are being PPR'd,
> > >   and tables, trees, treeTables, navigationPanes and trains
> > >   will be entirely skipped unless they or one of their contents
> > >   is being PPR'd.
> > >
> > >   Until now, PPR rendered everything and a ResponseWriter trimmed
> > >   out what shouldn't be rendered.  That's still the case in part, but
> > >   we can now entirely skip some branches of the UIComponent hierarchy.
> > >   (The client validation code had to be somewhat overhauled to make
> > >   this possible.)
> > >
> > > - A new "addDomReplaceListener()" method provides notification
> > >   of DOM changes from PPR.  A trivial example is:
> > >
> > > function notePpr(oldDom, newDom)
> > > {
> > >  console.log("old", oldDom);
> > >  console.log("new", newDom);
> > > }
> > >
> > > TrPage.getInstance().addDomReplaceListener(notePpr);
> > >
> > >   ... which logs to Firebug any DOM elements that have been
> > >   added or removed.
> > >
> > >  Feedback we need:  currently, this API is called *after*
> > >  the DOM replacement has happened, and gives you no
> > >  way of preventing or overriding the DOM replacement.  I'm
> > >  far from convinced that's the right choice:  it might be better
> > >  to run this before replacement and allow this  function to "return
> > >  false;", in which case no replacement would happen.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Adam Winer
> > >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to