Hello Wolfgang,
That's give a good path where I should go through.
Thanks a lot! Cheers.
----- Original Message ----
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 12:25:51 PM
Subject: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Why so many components?
Hi,
Definitely the latter one ("only
some of the in-house.."). Actually, I found the comment rather manager-like
and not really very informative.. ;)
I am looking forward to the Seam people
and their Trinidad integration work. Otherwise we will have lots of different
plumbing implementations around..
Best,
Wolfgang.
distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04.09.2007 12:08
Bitte antworten an
"MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
An
MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Kopie
Thema
Re: Antwort: Re: Why so many components?
Wolfgang,
Thanks for share this information and link. I was catch also for this comment
in that link:
"Its things like this that have conviced me that its time to throw
away a huge amount of in-house crufty stuff and move ahead with Seam/JSF
for all of our new development."
I did not understand if the comment is meant to replace Trinidad by using
Seam or only some of the in-house components implementations
in this context. Could you give me a hint on that?
Thank you very much.
----- Original Message ----
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 11:56:34 AM
Subject: Antwort: Re: Why so many components?
Hi,
There is also another issue with Trinidad and integration if you use Seam:
As of now, you cannot use it with tr:table unless you
do the 'plumbing' into Seam yourself and even so it does not seem clear
how to make the paging work..
See also
http://pmuir.bleepbleep.org.uk/2007/04/backing-trinidads-datatable-with-seam.html
Best,
Wolfgang.
distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04.09.2007 11:08
Bitte antworten an
"MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
An
MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Kopie
Thema
Re: Why so many components?
Andrew,
I was about to use A4J in that combination without any experience with.
Your support
on that has been priceless. Thank you so much again.
----- Original Message ----
From: Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 11:54:16 PM
Subject: Re: Why so many components?
FYI, I don't recommend that you use A4J in that combination unless you
need RichFaces. Just use the PPR functionality in Trinidad. You will
most likely have rendering problems with Trinidad+A4J
See http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/devguide/ppr.html
for
information on Trinidad's AJAX
-Andrew
On 9/3/07, distillingweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I know this use to be a obvious choice, but because I am a newcomer
in the
> MyFaces world, what answer
> I would give to my manager if he ask me why am I using so many components?
>
> Now, following advices, I am planning to use MyFaces + Trinidad +
Tomahawk +
> Facelets + Ajax4JSF and
> maybe Seam.
>
> I know each of them provide different resources, but is there a couple
or
> three of them that could give me like 90% of
> all my requirements need?
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> ________________________________
> Building a website is a piece of cake.
> Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check
out tonight's top picks on Yahoo!
TV.
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer
activities for kids.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the
Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
