I remember that there was a discussion on a change, related to
skinning of tree / treeTable.

But, looks like that Wolfgang has an issue with "tree" and "table"
after updating to 1.2.3.

-M

On 10/18/07, Cristi Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> I discussed on the mailling list with Jeanne W. and Martin M. about the
> skinning of the tree and treeTable
> and I refactored and improved them (a lot I might say)
> I created an issue TRINIDAD-769 and submitted a patch with the
> modifications.
> I worked on 1.0.4 snapshot, but I believe they'll work just fine on 1.2.*
> too.
>
> Can you please check the patch and maybe submit it if ok?
> I added skin-selector docs, default skin entries and I added a tree in the
> skins demo.
>
> There are also some old p_Ora... skin selectors for the tree that might be
> not used anymore,
> I could refactor them also, but I thought in a separate patch.
>
> regards,
>
>
>
>  On 10/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Eh,
> >
> > that sounds bad.
> > Can you confirm that by some more info ?
> >
> > Was there any commit that broke it ?
> >
> > Thx,
> > Matthias
> >
> > On 10/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Another problem with 1.2.3 SNAPSHOT (10/12/07) seems to be that the
> skinnings of various components
> > > are gone e.g. the trees and tables.
> > >
> > > It is not a matter of any skinnig setup in the CSS file, it is the basic
> skinning that comes out-of-the-box which
> > > has magically disappeared now :-(
> > >
> > > I noticed this quite late because of not restarting the application
> server often enough.. ;)
> > >
> > > I think this should be made sure it is fixed. Otherwise, believe it, the
> whole 1.2.3 would look pretty poor!
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Wolfgang.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > 17.10.2007 09:55
> > >
> > > Bitte antworten an
> > >  "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > An "MyFaces Discussion" < users@myfaces.apache.org>
> > >
> > > Kopie
> > >
> > >
> > > Thema Re: Re: [Trinidad] your thoughts on a 1.2.3 rc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  Hi,
> > >
> > >  Not so sure if it's really there or, even, if the fixes really relate
> to FF 2.
> > >
> > >  Our snapshot is from last Friday,  10/12/07. The last svn entry I saw
> from below svn link is from 7th of October.
> > >  I tested panelPopup on FF 2 with the 1.2.3 SNAPSHOT just a few moments
> ago and
> > >  it completely blocks the whole FF window including the panelPopup, see
> below(est) mail.
> > >
> > >  Best wishes,
> > >  Wolfgang.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  "Andrew Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > 16.10.2007 20:57
> > >
> > >
> > > Bitte antworten an
> > >  "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > An "MyFaces Discussion" < users@myfaces.apache.org>
> > >
> > > Kopie
> > >
> > >
> > > Thema Re: [Trinidad] your thoughts on a 1.2.3 rc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  AFAICT the file does have the 1.0.3 changes
> > >
> > >  File:
> > >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/trinidad/branches/1.2.3-branch/trinidad-impl/src/main/javascript/META-INF/adf/jsLibs/PanelPopup.js
> > >
> > >  On 10/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > >  Hi,
> > >
> > >  The only issue that I noticed which is important to have fixed in the
> 1.2.3 rc ( at least for our project ;)
> > >  is the panelPopup with modal=true in FF2. AFAIK it is fixed in 1.0.3,
> according to below attached mail,
> > >  and so I assume it will also be in 1.2.3 hopefully :-)
> > >
> > >  We have been working with a 1.2.3. SNAPSHOT for a while and it seemed
> rather stable to us.
> > >  So I would vote for a go at 1.2.3rc (again, provided above fix is
> contained ;)
> > >
> > >  Best wishes,
> > >  Wolfgang.
> > >
> > >  On 10/16/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >  hi,
> > >
> > >  I am still behind my mails, but noticed that a 1.2.3-branch has been
> > >  created. I'd like to ask for a timeframe for when we can try to
> > >  release a 1.2.3, based on this branch.
> > >
> > >  Are there any (big) know issues?
> > >  Did someone used it for testing already?
> > >
> > >  Thx,
> > >  Matthias
> > >
> > >  ----- Weitergeleitet von Wolfgang Toepfer/PTA_GL/De am 16.10.2007 15:01
> -----
> > >  "Andrew Robinson" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > 11.10.2007 18:08
> > >
> > >
> > > Bitte antworten an
> > >  "MyFaces Discussion" < users@myfaces.apache.org >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > An "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org >
> > >
> > > Kopie
> > >
> > >
> > > Thema Re: [Trinidad] tr:panelPopup broken in Trinidad 1.2.2 with FF 2.x
> ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  1.2.3 will have some large position fixes. 1.0.3 already has them.
> > >
> > >  On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >  >
> > >  > Hi,
> > >  >
> > >  > For your information, as I am not sure wether this is a known problem
> > >  > or just a configuration issue on my side.
> > >  >
> > >  >  I tried a simple popup such as
> > >  >
> > >  > <tr:panelPopup text="Auftragsselektion!" title="Gefundene Auftraege"
> > >  > alignment="center" modal="true">
> > >  >
> > >  >                 <tr:outputText value="Do you want to finish?" />
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >                                  <trh:rowLayout>
> > >  >
> > >  > <tr:commandButton accessKey="1" text="1:Cancel"
> > >  >
> > >  > action="fXAbbrechen"/>
> > >  >
> > >  > <tr:commandButton accessKey="2" text="2:Ok"
> > >  >
> > >  > action="f1Change"/>
> > >  >                                    </trh:rowLayout>
> > >  >
> > >  >  </tr:panelPopup>
> > >  >
> > >  > However, this only works in IE 7 but not in FF 2.x. In FF the
> behaviour is
> > >  > strangely buggy: the mouse pointer
> > >  > switches to a "prohibited" symbol and everything is disabled apart
> from FF's
> > >  > close button. BTW there is no
> > >  > Javascript error.
> > >  >
> > >  > Any ideas regarding this behaviour?
> > >  >
> > >  > Thanks,
> > >  > Wolfgang.
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cristi Toth
>
> -------------
> Codebeat
> www.codebeat.ro


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to