hi people,
i think its better to use jsf components when you dont have html equivalent
component, it means that If the application server has a small tree of
objects, its performance would be better that another application with more
components.
2008/1/30, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi!
> >> Is it better to use plain html tags (if possible) instead of jsf-tags
> >> e.g. for images, divs etc when no EL expressions are used ?
> >>
> >
> > Yes, definitely. This is just a block of "verbatim" text, which is
> written out very efficiently. Using a component to write the same text is
> much slower and gains nothing.
> >
> > And it looks nicer too..
> >
> I would not have answered if you would not have used the word
> "definitely" ;-)
>
> I'd prefer to use components only. With one exception, static texts -
> but how many static texts do you have in an i18n enabled application :-)
>
> Using components is just the base idea of JSF and in the long run I
> think you are on the safe side using them.
> For example, would you really write <img
> src="#{context.contextPath}/to/my/image.png" /> ?
> Looks really like in g'ol days with JSP, no?
>
> Having <h:graphicImage src="/to/my/image.png" /> is not that much
> longer, and saves you from the internals of the used servlet environment.
>
>
> In the end it is all about personal preferences :-)
>
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>
--
Alonso Isidoro Roman.
