As far as I can see, t2c appears nowhere in the myfaces or tomahawk code. It seems like it is coming from your code.
What are the results on a grep for t2c in all of your source code? On Feb 6, 2008 9:22 AM, Łukasz Budnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I'm using: > > myfaces-api-1.2.2 and myfaces-impl-1.2.2 > > with: > > myfaces-shared-tomahawk-3.0.1 > tomahawk-1.1.7-SNAPSHOT > > best regards > Łukasz > > On 06/02/2008, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That doesn't make much sense to me as generated IDs are in the form of > > "_id##", so t2c is not possible unless you or some code explicitly sets > it > > somewhere. What JSF impl version are you using. > > > > Also try grepping your code for t2c. > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > On Feb 5, 2008 4:38 PM, Łukasz Budnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > My view code is simply copy & paste from: > > > http://www.irian.at/myfacesexamples/tree2.jsp.source > > > > > > and looks like this: > > > > > > > > > <t:tree2 id="clientTree" value="#{Tree2TestController.treeData}" > > > var="node" varNodeToggler="t"> > > > <f:facet name="person"> > > > <h:panelGroup> > > > <f:facet name="expand"> > > > <t:graphicImage > > > value="/images/tomahawk/yellow-folder-open.png" > > > rendered="#{t.nodeExpanded}" border="0"/> > > > </f:facet> > > > <f:facet name="collapse"> > > > <t:graphicImage > > > value="/images/tomahawk/yellow-folder-closed.png" > > > rendered="#{!t.nodeExpanded}" border="0"/> > > > </f:facet> > > > <h:outputText value="#{node.description}" > > > styleClass="nodeFolder"/> > > > </h:panelGroup> > > > </f:facet> > > > <f:facet name="foo-folder"> > > > <h:panelGroup> > > > <f:facet name="expand"> > > > <t:graphicImage > > > value="/images/tomahawk/yellow-folder-open.png" > > > rendered="#{t.nodeExpanded}" border="0"/> > > > </f:facet> > > > <f:facet name="collapse"> > > > <t:graphicImage > > > value="/images/tomahawk/yellow-folder-closed.png" > > > rendered="#{!t.nodeExpanded}" border="0"/> > > > </f:facet> > > > <h:outputText value="#{node.description}" > > > styleClass="nodeFolder"/> > > > <h:outputText value=" > > > (#{node.childCount})" styleClass="childCount" rendered="#{!empty > > > node.children}"/> > > > </h:panelGroup> > > > </f:facet> > > > <f:facet name="bar-folder"> > > > <h:panelGroup> > > > <f:facet name="expand"> > > > <t:graphicImage > > > value="/images/tomahawk/blue-folder-open.gif" > > > rendered="#{t.nodeExpanded}" border="0"/> > > > </f:facet> > > > <f:facet name="collapse"> > > > <t:graphicImage > > > value="/images/tomahawk/blue-folder-closed.png" > > > rendered="#{!t.nodeExpanded}" border="0"/> > > > </f:facet> > > > <h:outputText value="#{node.description}" > > > styleClass="nodeFolder"/> > > > <h:outputText value=" > > > (#{node.childCount})" styleClass="childCount" rendered="#{!empty > > > node.children}"/> > > > </h:panelGroup> > > > </f:facet> > > > <f:facet name="document"> > > > <h:panelGroup> > > > <h:commandLink immediate="true" > > > styleClass="#{t.nodeSelected ? 'documentSelected':'document'}" > > > actionListener="#{t.setNodeSelected}"> > > > <t:graphicImage > > > value="/images/tomahawk/document.png" border="0"/> > > > <h:outputText value="#{node.description > }"/> > > > <f:param name="docNum" > > > value="#{node.identifier}"/> > > > </h:commandLink> > > > </h:panelGroup> > > > </f:facet> > > > </t:tree2> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best regards > > > Łukasz > > > > > > On 05/02/2008, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Where is the view code? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 5, 2008 12:08 PM, Łukasz Budnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Sorry, > > > > > > > > > > this is full stack trace, the id treeForm:clientTree:t2c is > repeated 3 > > > > > times (I have highlighted it): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javax.servlet.ServletException: Component ID > treeForm:clientTree:t2c > > > > > has already been found in the view. See below for details. > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_0 > > > > > type: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: treeForm > > > > > type: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: clientTree > > > > > type: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_17 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_18 > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_19 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_20 > > > > > type: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_3 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_4 > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: t2c > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_6 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_12 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_13 > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: t2c > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_15 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_16 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_7 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_8 > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: t2c > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_10 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_11 > > > > > type: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:256) > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.myfaces.webapp.filter.ExtensionsFilter.doFilter( > ExtensionsFilter.java:147) > > > > > > > > > > > org.netbeans.modules.web.monitor.server.MonitorFilter.doFilter( > MonitorFilter.java:390) > > > > > > > > > > best regards > > > > > Łukasz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 05/02/2008, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > No this is right. Component IDs in "looping" components should > > always be > > > > the > > > > > > same. Client IDs change. > > > > > > > > > > > > Your example doesn't show t2c at all. Look for two components it > > your > > > > page > > > > > > that are under the tree and have t2c as their ID. Maybe you > thought > > that > > > > two > > > > > > components could have the same ID in different facets? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 5, 2008 10:54 AM, Łukasz Budnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm running a <t:tree2 /> example available at: > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at/myfacesexamples/tree2.jsf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And the result is: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javax.servlet.ServletException: Component ID > > treeForm:clientTree:t2c > > > > > > > has already been found in the view. See below for details. > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_0 > > > > > > > type: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > +id: treeForm > > > > > > > type: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > +id: clientTree > > > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_17 > > > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_18 > > > > > > > type: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > +id: j_id_jsp_287013395_19 > > > > > > > type: > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... and so on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the only id that I have set in my tree.jsp are: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <h:form id="treeForm"> > > > > > > > <t:tree2 id="clientTree" value="#{ > Tree2TestController.treeData}" > > > > > > > var="node" varNodeToggler="t"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the rest is simply copy and paste from the above mentioned web > > site. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm using: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > myfaces-shared-tomahawk-3.0.1 > > > > > > > tomahawk-1.1.7-SNAPSHOT > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since all ids should be unique clearly this is... a bug? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best regards > > > > > > > Łukasz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
