2008/4/4 周恩 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Yes, there are differences between Tomahawk, Trindad, Tobago, Orchestra and
> so on, but as a jsf implemenation user , I think that it's bad new that
> there are so many similar implemenations under a same place.  I think that

again... in Apache there is only ONE impl.
MyFaces CORE.
The other projects are independent! from the implementation.
They are:
-add-ons
-component libraries


> jsf circle must gather the power to implement one or two jsf implemenations.

well there are only two...

>
>  In my opinion, many choice is no choice!

Actually choice is good. That's how the "free market economy" works.

-Matthias


>
>  Sorry for my poor english, thanks all of you.
>
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>  Subject: RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application
> architectures
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:29:20 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> Maybe you are mixing a few things.
>
> JSF implemenations are MyFaces-JSF (by Apache MyFaces) and Mojarra (by Sun)
>
> Tomahawk, Trindad and Tobago are Component Sets that sit on top of
> JSF-implementations
> (eg. Tomahawk works well also with Mojarra)
>
> regards
> Alexander
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>  From: 周恩 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:43 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: RE: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application
> architectures
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> My main question is "Which is the best Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application
> architecture practise"? Let's discuss it more.
>
> I think that the advice to apache must be think better of:
>     Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two Jsfimplements, now
> there are too many implements under Apache foundation! Tomahawk must keep
> updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and sanbox in new version!
>
> I use JavaServer Faces from 2004 in real application, and I have write a
> rapid java development tool with myfaces. but which is the best practise is
> still puzzle me.
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:04:59 +0200
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Advice to apache and look for nice Myfaces/Jsf application
> architectures
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Gerald Müllan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:> > Hi,
>
>
> > >
> > > cagatay has published a very nice example application called
> > > "moviestore" using spring and a good jsf technology stack:
> > >
> > >
> http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/annotate-jsf-beans-with-spring-25
> > >
> > > facesgoodies is also a very nice and easy example project in order to
> > > study a real world jsf web application:
> > >
> > > http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies
> > >
> > > Both are a good start in order to get in touch with popular technology
> > > stacks related to jsf.
> >
> > just a minor comment. FacesGoodi es uses Orchestra's extra scopes,
> > which I really strongly recommend to use.
> >
> > See:
> >
> http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/dynamic-tables-and-orchestras-conversation-scope/
> >
> > -M
> >
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > >
> > > Gerald> >
>
>
> > >
> > > 2008/4/4 周恩 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,anybody!
> > > > I am a chinese with poor english. I am looking for any nice
> Myfaces/Jsf
> > > > enterprise application samples, I want to see your enterprise
> Myfaces/Jsf
> > > > application architectures and choose the best one for my pjoject?
> > > > The main question of mine is about real application's managed bean
> > > > scope and MVC's controller implement strategy.
> > > > Can anybody share somes for us include me and discuss which is the
> best
> > > &g t; architectures practise?
> > > > I think a nice Myfaces/Jsf enterprise application architecture's
> > > > persistence layer must be flexible with different implement such as
> > > > JDBC,hibernate and others.
> > > > Sorry for my poor english.
> > > >
>  > > > btw: I think that Apache must gather it's power to focus one or two
> Jsf
> > > > implements, now there are too many implements under Apache foundation!
> > > > Tomahawk must keep updating with compatible MyFaces core, impl and
> sanbox in
> > > > new version! Please.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > En Zhou,Beijin,China. 2008-04-04
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > "七件武器,七种完美" 立刻体验!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, D evelopment and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > session s: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
>
>  ________________________________
>  Windows Live Writer,支持离线撰写博客内容,随时随地想写就写。 立即使用!
> ________________________________
> 使用新一代 Windows Live Messenger 轻松交流和共享! 立即体验!



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to