Hi, No I do not use portlets. I am now writing a simple test case, to see if I can reproduce it. With the simplest case, everything is working as expected, so there has to be some conflict with the rest of the application (e.g. Spring 3 proxies, the transaction manager or something else). I am investigating to see if I can reproduce it...
The conversationContext is fine in both scenarios... Bruno On 1 July 2010 16:50, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote: > Heya! > > Please check the url parameter conversationContext has been added to each > and every url. > > If it is missing, a new context will be created each request and then a new > bean will be created too. > > Now you sure would like to know why it is missing ... if it is missing. > > Hmmm ... do you use portlets or such? > > > Ciao, > Mario > > PS: Sorry for top-posting, Mail-Client oddities ... :) > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Bruno Aranda [mailto:brunoara...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 01. Juli 2010 14:42 > An: MyFaces Discussion > Betreff: Re: Problems with orchestra and JSF 2 > > What I can see as well after putting a method with the @PostConstruct > annotation, is that this method is called every request, as if the > conversation didn't exist before, which is not true. > > I am outputting the orchestra logs in the console, and I can see: > > 2010-07-01 14:05:32,729 [qtp33228489-20] DEBUG (DebugPhaseListener,40) - > Before phase: RESTORE_VIEW(1) > 2010-07-01 14:05:32,823 [qtp33228489-20] DEBUG (Conversation,108) - start > conversation:general > > NEW INSTANCE PUBCONTROLLER HASH: 9f720d > > ==== POST CONS PUB === 9f720d > > NEW INSTANCE PUBCONTROLLER HASH: 147f75 > NEW INSTANCE PUBCONTROLLER HASH: 1bbefe8 > > 2010-07-01 14:05:32,844 [qtp33228489-20] DEBUG (Conversation,176) - put > bean > to conversation:org.springframework.beans.factory.support.Dispo > sablebeanadap...@25394361 > > (bean=org.apache.myfaces.orchestra.conversation.spring.AbstractSpringOrchest > rascop...@17167e6 > ) > 2010-07-01 14:05:32,846 [qtp33228489-20] DEBUG (Conversation,176) - put > bean > to conversation:org.apache.myfaces.orchestra.conversation.sprin > > g.PersistenceContextConversationInterceptor.PERSISTENCE_CONTEXT(bean=org.apa > che.myfaces.orchestra.conversation.spring.PersistenceContextClos > e...@81f22c) > 2010-07-01 14:05:32,847 [qtp33228489-20] DEBUG (Conversation,176) - put > bean > to conversation:publicationController(bean=uk.ac.ebi.intact.edi > tor.controller.curate.publication.publicationcontrol...@9f720d) > 2010-07-01 14:05:32,853 [qtp33228489-20] DEBUG (DebugPhaseListener,35) - > After phase: RESTORE_VIEW(1) > ... > > The bean is called "publicationController", which should be maintained in a > conversation called "general". And I see this every request. This is the > bean class annotations: > > @Controller > @Scope( "conversation.access" ) > @ConversationName( "general" ) > public class PublicationController extends AnnotatedObjectController { > ...} > > I fail to see why the bean is not re-used as the conversation is not ended. > > And then, if I let the conversation expire, I see the message as many times > as instances have been created (three requests in my case to the same > page...). > > 2010-07-01 14:39:28,563 [Orchestra:ConversationWiperThread] DEBUG > (Conversation,311) - destroy conversation:general > 2010-07-01 14:39:28,565 [Orchestra:ConversationWiperThread] DEBUG > (Conversation,311) - destroy conversation:general > 2010-07-01 14:39:28,566 [Orchestra:ConversationWiperThread] DEBUG > (Conversation,311) - destroy conversation:general > > So I am not sure what is happening here :( > > Bruno > > On 1 July 2010 13:27, Bruno Aranda <brunoara...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I see, yes, that could explain it as Spring is creating proxies all over > > the place to make some of the annotations work. However I am not doing > > anything in the constructors, but for instance, if I set a property on a > > backing bean (conversation.access scope), when I click on a button that > > value seems to have been lost, as if I was accessing another object... > > probably something to do with proxies as well and orchestra? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Bruno > > > > > > On 1 July 2010 13:22, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > > > >> Hi Bruno! > >> > >> > First, could someone explain me why the > >> > beans constructor > >> is called multiple times? > >> > >> What you see might be an effect of proxies. > >> Usually if a subclassing proxy gets initialised, the constructor of the > >> proxied class gets called. > >> This is the reason why it's not suggested to use constructors for > >> initialisations at all but instead use > >> @PostConstruct (resp @PreDestroy instead of finalize) > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ---- > >> > From: brunoaranda <brunoara...@gmail.com> > >> > To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org> > >> > Sent: Thu, July 1, 2010 12:55:30 PM > >> > Subject: Problems with orchestra and JSF 2 > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > >> I am having some troubles with orchestra maintaining some beans > >> > in > >> "conversation access" scope. First, could someone explain me why the > >> > beans > >> constructor is called multiple times? In my app I have multiple beans > >> > with > >> the same conversation name and when I access one of the other beans from > >> > my > >> bean, it seems as it is picking a new instance. The same scenario works > >> > fine > >> using "session" beans, but of course then I lose all the nice > >> > transaction > >> management from Orchestra. Anyone with an idea where I can I > >> > look? How is > >> people dealing with JPA and transactions scoping multiple > >> > requests in JSF 2? > >> > >> I am having another issue as well. Even if I have one > >> > bean, the data seems > >> not to be in the model when I click on a button that > >> > invokes a method in > >> that bean. For this specific case, I have a > >> > <f:metadata> section with a > >> viewParam. I can see the param being set in > >> > the update model phase, but the > >> bean's existing data seems to be lost? For > >> > sure, I must be doing something > >> wrong but I am unable to see > >> > what. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Bruno > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >
