Hallo Mark,

I have to admit that I never used an @Intercepter till now. I simple wanted
to add a CDI @ViewScope to my project. That was the reason why I tried to
include Seam3, Codi and at last the small @ViewScope implementation posted
by Verborgh at https://github.com/verborghs/jsf-cdi. I packed the code into
a jar added it to my EAR libs in the testproject and it works. !!! But !!!!
it only works as long as you don't use any EJBs from the ejb.jar. The moment
you include a jar file with a cdi-extension in your EAR - none of the EJBs
can be created anymore. 

I think there is a huuuge bug in Glassfish-Weld installation I'm using. What
makes me wonder if I'm the only one having a project constisting of a war
and an ejb.jar deployed in an EAR, who wants to use CDExtension. I mean this
is not really uncommon, isn't it ?

Although I would appretiate your help very much, I'm aware of the fact that
my problem isn't CODI related ! But do you know anybody with a project like
mine who uses CODI successfully or do you know where I could possibly
download an example ? The ones that Gerhard provided includes only a
webproject !
 
Liebe Grüße
Thomas

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. November 2010 18:04
An: MyFaces Discussion
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: CODI 0.9.0 + Glassfish V3.0.1 + EAR

oki, could you please test if any other @Interceptor in a jar works for you?

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Fri, 11/26/10, Ing. Thomas Kernstock <t.kernst...@e-technologies.at>
wrote:

> From: Ing. Thomas Kernstock <t.kernst...@e-technologies.at>
> Subject: AW: AW: CODI 0.9.0 + Glassfish V3.0.1 + EAR
> To: "'MyFaces Discussion'" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
> Date: Friday, November 26, 2010, 4:50 PM Hi Mark,
> 
> second answer
> -> in the link you provided the Fix Version for this
> problem is 1.1.0 Beta
> 1.   I checked the weld-bundle in my
> Glassfish installation. The Metafile
> says->
> Bundle-SymbolicName: org.jboss.weld.osgi-bundle
> Implementation-Version: 1.0.1.SP3
> Specification-Vendor: Seam Framework
> Bundle-Name: Weld OSGi Bundle
> Created-By: Apache Maven Bundle Plugin
> 
> So I'm afraid this problem still exists !
> 
> Thomas
> 
> ___________________________________
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de]
> 
> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. November 2010 16:53
> An: MyFaces Discussion
> Betreff: Re: AW: CODI 0.9.0 + Glassfish V3.0.1 + EAR
> 
> which glassfish version are you using? There was an error in this area 
> in weld https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-507
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> --- On Fri, 11/26/10, Ing. Thomas Kernstock 
> <t.kernst...@e-technologies.at>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Ing. Thomas Kernstock <t.kernst...@e-technologies.at>
> > Subject: AW: CODI 0.9.0 + Glassfish V3.0.1 + EAR
> > To: "'MyFaces Discussion'" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
> > Date: Friday, November 26, 2010, 3:34 PM Hi Gerhard,
> > 
> > thanx for the late reply or should I say early for
> Vienna
> > :-)
> > 
> > I knew that CDI-extensions work for projects without
> an EAR File. What
> > I found out today was, that I have to move librarys
> with
> > cdi-extensions to the EAR project and reference them
> only instead of
> > having them in the war-project. This works for a
> testproject with
> > Verborgs @ViewScope implementation but when I try this
> with
> > myfaces-codi I get the following
> > error:
> > 
> > Deployment Error for module: TEST-EAR: Exception while
> loading the app
> > :
> > org.glassfish.deployment.common.DeploymentException:
> > WELD-001417 Enabled
> > interceptor class class
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.jsf.impl.security.SecurityIntercepto
> > r
> > is
> > neither annotated @Interceptor nor registered through
> a portable
> > extension%%%EOL%%%
> > 
> > Do you have any idea what could cause the problem ? 
> > 
> > Best regards
> > 
> > Thomas
> > ___________________________________
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Gerhard [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com]
> > 
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 26. November 2010 03:11
> > An: MyFaces Discussion
> > Betreff: Re: CODI 0.9.0 + Glassfish V3.0.1 + EAR
> > 
> > hi thomas,
> > 
> > usually the mentioned exception occurs with servlet
> containers if cdi
> > wasn't configured correctly.
> > in case of glassfish you don't need a special cdi
> configuration.
> > it >might< be a glassfish or weld issue in
> combination with ears.
> > at [1] you can find examples which are tested with
> glassfish v3.
> > 
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> > 
> > [1] http://bitbucket.org/os890/codi-examples
> > 
> > http://www.irian.at
> > 
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> > 
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2010/11/26 Ing. Thomas Kernstock <t.kernst...@e-technologies.at>
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I downloaded and built the last version of CODI
> today,
> > and included
> > > the resulting
> > myfaces-extcdi-dist-jsf20-0.9.1-SNAPSHOT.jar in my
> > > Webproject (JSF2.0, CDI Enabled(=beans.xml in
> place),
> > Dependending on
> > > the Glassfish
> > > V3.0.1 libs).
> > > This Webproject is part of an EAR which also
> contains
> > an EJB Project
> > > with Entities,DTO's and Services. When I deploy
> the
> > EAR to my
> > > Glassfishserver
> > > V3.0.1 and start the application I get the
> following
> > error:
> > >
> > > WARNUNG: StandardWrapperValve[Faces Servlet]:
> PWC1406:
> > 
> > > Servlet.service() for servlet Faces Servlet
> threw
> > exception
> > > java.lang.IllegalStateException: no
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.core.api.provider.BeanManagerProvide
> > > r in place! Please ensure that you configured the
> CDI
> > implementation
> > > of your choice properly.
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.core.api.provider.BeanManagerProvide
> > > r.getI
> > > nstance(BeanManagerProvider.java:60)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.jsf2.impl.listener.request.CodiFaces
> > > Contex
> > > tWrapper.init(CodiFacesContextWrapper.java:62)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.jsf2.impl.listener.request.CodiFaces
> > > Contex
> > >
> >
> tWrapper.<init>(CodiFacesContextWrapper.java:57)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.jsf2.impl.listener.request.CodiFaces
> > > Contex
> > >
> >
> tFactory.getFacesContext(CodiFacesContextFactory.java:63)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.webapp.filter.TomahawkFacesContextFactory.getFacesC
> > > ontext
> > > (TomahawkFacesContextFactory.java:107)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.faces.context.InjectionFacesContextFactory.getFacesContext(Inj
> > > ection
> > > FacesContextFactory.java:101)
> > >  at
> >
> javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:302)
> > >  at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.service(StandardWrapper.java:
> > > 1523)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Appli
> > > cation
> > > FilterChain.java:343)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFi
> > > lterCh
> > > ain.java:215)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.primefaces.webapp.filter.FileUploadFilter.doFilter(FileUploadFilte
> > > r.java
> > > :79)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Appli
> > > cation
> > > FilterChain.java:256)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFi
> > > lterCh
> > > ain.java:215)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperVa
> > > lve.ja
> > > va:277)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextVa
> > > lve.ja
> > > va:188)
> > >  at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java
> > > :641)  at
> > >
> >
> com.sun.enterprise.web.WebPipeline.invoke(WebPipeline.java:97)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.enterprise.web.PESessionLockingStandardPipeline.invoke(PESessi
> > > onLock
> > > ingStandardPipeline.java:85)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.ja
> > > va:185
> > > )
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.doService(CoyoteAdapter.ja
> > > va:325
> > > )
> > >  at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java
> > > :226)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
>
com.sun.enterprise.v3.services.impl.ContainerMapper.service(ContainerMapper.
> > > java:165)
> > >  at
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.http.ProcessorTask.invokeAdapter(ProcessorTask.java:79
> > > 1)  at
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.http.ProcessorTask.doProcess(ProcessorTask.java:693)
> > >  at
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.http.ProcessorTask.process(ProcessorTask.java:954)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.http.DefaultProtocolFilter.execute(DefaultProtocolFilt
> > > er.jav
> > > a:170)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.DefaultProtocolChain.executeProtocolFilter(DefaultProt
> > > ocolCh
> > > ain.java:135)
> > >  at
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.DefaultProtocolChain.execute(DefaultProtocolChain.java
> > > :102)
> > >  at
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.DefaultProtocolChain.execute(DefaultProtocolChain.java
> > > :88)
> > >  at
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.http.HttpProtocolChain.execute(HttpProtocolChain.java:
> > > 76)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.ProtocolChainContextTask.doCall(ProtocolChainContextTa
> > > sk.jav
> > > a:53)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.SelectionKeyContextTask.call(SelectionKeyContextTask.j
> > > ava:57
> > > )
> > >  at
> > com.sun.grizzly.ContextTask.run(ContextTask.java:69)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.util.AbstractThreadPool$Worker.doWork(AbstractThreadPo
> > > ol.jav
> > > a:330)
> > >  at
> > >
> > >
> >
> com.sun.grizzly.util.AbstractThreadPool$Worker.run(AbstractThreadPool.
> > > java:3
> > > 09)
> > >  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> > >
> > > Do I have to configure something in my
> application ? I
> > couldn't find
> > > any hint in the documentation though !
> > >
> > > best regards
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
> 


      


Reply via email to