Hi Marcus, great thanks - will do according to your advice.
2011/5/2 Marcus Büttner <buettner.mar...@gmail.com> > Hi, > > at the moment there's no binary available. > you can get the source and build it by yourself. > > I would recommend that you check out tomahawk 1.1.10 (because you already > use tomahawk 1.1.10 in your project) from: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/tags/tomahawk-project-1.1.10 > > you have to build at least sandbox/core and sandbox/core12. > > I don't know, if there's a better and easier way. > > regards, > Marcus > > > 2011/5/2 Anton Gavazuk <antongava...@gmail.com> > > > Hi Marcus, > > > > could you suggest where can I download latest sandbox binaries/sources? > > > > 2011/5/2 Marcus Büttner <buettner.mar...@gmail.com> > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > in the current sandbox project 1.1.11-SNAPSHOT the fieldset is already > > > removed. > > > > > > regards, > > > Marcus > > > > > > 2011/5/1 Anton Gavazuk <antongava...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > Hi Leonardo, > > > > > > > > you are absolutely right, > > > > I had 2 fieldset packages - first was coming from tomahawk library > > > > and second was from tomahawk-sandbox library - I'm using > > > > sandbox tomahawk-sandbox-1.1.9-SNAPSHOT.jar and that one contains > also > > > > org\apache\myfaces\custom\fieldset package - I think it should be > > removed > > > > from sandbox as fieldset is a part of tomahawk core. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > 2011/4/4 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > It seems you could have two tomahawk versions on the same > classpath. > > > > > > > > > > The generated jsp tag class on version 1.2 or 2.0 looks like this: > > > > > > > > > > public class FieldsetTag > > > > > extends org.apache.myfaces.custom.htmlTag.HtmlTagTag > > > > > { > > > > > public FieldsetTag() > > > > > { > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > public String getComponentType() > > > > > { > > > > > return "org.apache.myfaces.Fieldset"; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > public String getRendererType() > > > > > { > > > > > return "org.apache.myfaces.FieldsetRenderer"; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > private ValueExpression _legend; > > > > > > > > > > public void setLegend(ValueExpression legend) > > > > > { > > > > > _legend = legend; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > The previous code is correct. In tomahawk for version 1.1, String > is > > > used > > > > > instead ValueExpression. So it is probably your code takes > tomahawk12 > > > tld > > > > > and tomahawk for jsf 1.1 classes, causing the problem previously > > > > mentioned. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Leonardo Uribe > > > > > > > > > > 2011/4/3 Anton Gavazuk <antongava...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > got a nice issue during migration of my jsf 1.2 application to > > JBoss > > > 6. > > > > > > Current version of tomahawk in my project is: > tomahawk12-1.1.10.jar > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm getting such error when one of my jsps containing fieldset > tag > > is > > > > > being > > > > > > accessed: > > > > > > > > > > > > The method setLegend(String) in the type FieldsetTag is not > > > applicable > > > > > for > > > > > > the arguments (JspValueExpression) > > > > > > > > > > > > I looked in tld class for legend attribute definition: > > > > > > > > > > > > <attribute> > > > > > > <name>legend</name> > > > > > > <deferred-value></deferred-value> > > > > > > <description><![CDATA[The fieldset's > > > > legend.]]></description> > > > > > > </attribute> > > > > > > > > > > > > And compared with previous version - they are the same and I > dont > > > see > > > > > any > > > > > > issue with this one. > > > > > > > > > > > > What could be wrong? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
