Might be permitted due to security reasons?

Just a guess...

LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: Milo van der Zee <m...@vanderzee.org>
> To: users@myfaces.apache.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 8:12 AM
> Subject: Re: JSF 1.2: #{object.class.name} not allowed
> 
> Strange that you get that error in JSF1.2. I only started getting it in
> JSF2.1. There I could replace the .class with .getClass() and all was
> fine again :)
> 
> I agree that it is rather odd. I'm looking forward to the reason 
> 'why'
> that some of the experts here might now :)
> 
> MAG,
> Milo
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 18:11 -0500, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>>  I got this error earlier today.
>> 
>>  /pages/notAuthorized.xhtml @42,172 value=" to access page
>>  '#{page.unauthorizedPage.class.name}'" The identifier [class] 
> is not a
>>  valid Java identifier as required by section 1.19 of the EL
>>  specification (Identifier ::= Java language identifier). This check
>>  can be disabled by setting the system property
>>  org.apache.el.parser.SKIP_IDENTIFIER_CHECK to true.
>> 
>>  It seems rather odd to me that ".class" is not an allowed EL
>>  expression component since Object obviously implements getClass().
>> 
> 

Reply via email to