Hi Leo!

Did you also try the stuff with composite components inside ui:repeat? 

Default components seem to work, but composite components are probably broken.


Buett will upload a sample code later today.

LieGrue,
strub


----- Original Message -----
> From: Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>
> To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Ajax update of a composite component within ui:repeat doesn't 
> work
> 
> Hi
> 
> There was two issues solved in 2.1.7 related to ui:repeat:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3415
> 
> [ui:repeat] field value disappears if validation error exists on current site
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3463
> 
> Refactor UIRepeat code to implement PSS algorithm like UIData and fix
> state behavior
> 
> The code taken from UIData has been already tested and there are some
> junit tests for ui:repeat, so in theory it should work.
> 
> regards,
> 
> Leonardo Uribe
> 
> 2012/4/16 Marcus Büttner <buettner.mar...@gmail.com>:
>>  Hi,
>> 
>>  This following example works with MyFaces 2.1.6 but not with 2.1.7.
>> 
>>  mycc.xhtml:
>>  <cc:interface>
>>     <cc:attribute name="state" 
> type="ExampleModel.State"/>
>>  </cc:interface>
>> 
>>  <cc:implementation>
>>     <h:selectBooleanCheckbox 
> value="#{cc.attrs.state.state}">
>>         <f:ajax execute="@this" render="@form"/>
>>     </h:selectBooleanCheckbox>
>>     <h:outputText value="State: #{cc.attrs.state.state}"/>
>>  </cc:implementation>
>> 
>> 
>>  example.xhtml:
>>  <h:form id="form">
>>     <ui:repeat value="#{example.states}" 
> var="state">
>>         <my:mycc state="#{state}"/>
>>     </ui:repeat>
>>     <my:mycc state="#{example.state}"/>
>>  </h:form>
>> 
>>  In debugger I saw the submitted value of the checkbox is set but this state
>>  is overridden a little bit later by
>>  UIRepeate#restoreDescendantComponentStates method which is triggered by
>>  UIRepeat#setIndex which is called by UIRepeat#visitTree.
>> 
>>  Any ideas?
>> 
>>  Regards,
>>  Marcus
>

Reply via email to