hi manuel, i guess - you are using weld... you can register a custom ProxyHelper to get rid of the issue.
regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2012/10/19 <manuel.gamerdin...@t-systems.com> > Hi Gerhard, > > I created an issue. My further analysis showed that this is a bug and not > an improvement. The byte code proxy is correct. The @BeanValidation > annotation is not marked as @Inherited and therefore not populated to its > subclasses. But the proxy is a subclass. > So for me there are 2 possibilities to correct: > 1) Make the Annotation inherited. But I think that would validate ExtVal's > concept of additive groups within a class hierarchy. > 2) The suggested solution from my mail before. > > It would be great if we could get a patch soon! > Thanx, > Manuel > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2012 13:19 > An: MyFaces Discussion > Betreff: Re: @BeanValidation annotation at class level > > hi manuel, > > thx for providing the details. > please file a jira ticket (improvement) for it at [1]. > > regards, > gerhard > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - > JavaEE Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2012/10/19 <manuel.gamerdin...@t-systems.com> > > > Update: It works when I use the @RequestScoped Annotation from > > javax.faces.bean instead of javax.enterprise.context. In that case > > there is no byte code proxy returned (objectToInspect.getClass()). > > But anyways I expect that it should also run with the CDI scopes. > > > > Manuel Gamerdinger > > > > T-Systems GEI GmbH > > Systems Integration > > Industry Application Solutions > > Project Center Industry Applications > > Manuel Gamerdinger > > Software Architect > > Fasanenweg 5, 70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen > > +49 711 999-8704 (Tel.) > > +49 160 8224185 (Mobil) > > E-Mail: manuel.gamerdin...@t-systems.com > > Internet: http://www.t-systems.de > > > > T-Systems GEI GmbH > > Supervisory Board: Dr. Ferri Abolhassan (Chairman) Board of > > Management: Hans-Jörg Glaß (Chairman), Jan Krellner Commercial > > register: Amtsgericht Aachen HRB 7106 Registered office: Aachen Int. > > VAT No. DE 811 137 130 > > > > Notice: This transmittal and/or attachments may be privileged or > > confidential. It is intended solely for the addressee named above. Any > > review, dissemination, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you > > received this transmittal in error, please notify us immediately by > > reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Thank > you. > > > > Big changes start small - conserve resources by not printing every > e-mail. > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Gamerdinger, Manuel > > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2012 12:38 > > An: users@myfaces.apache.org > > Betreff: AW: @BeanValidation annotation at class level > > > > Hi Gerhard, > > > > thanx for quick response. I tracked down the problem that the > > Annotation > > (@BeanValidation) is not available on objectToInspect.getClass() in > > > ExtValBeanValidationMetaDataInternals#transferGroupValidationInformationToFoundGroups. > > > > objectToInspect.getClass() returns a bytecode enhanced proxy class > > (...Dlg_$$_javassist_85) where I can see only the @RequestScoped > > Annotation from CDI. Besides @BeanValidation also the @Named > > Annotation from CDI is missing. > > I don't know if this behavior of a byte code proxy is correct!? I > > would expect that at least Annotations from Retention CLASS and > > RUNTIME are also available on the proxies. > > > > I also wonder a little why > > ExtValBeanValidationMetaDataInternals#processClass does not use the > > classToInspect (Unproxied Class) to gather the Annotations. If this > > method would pass classToInspect instead of objectToInspect to the > > #transferGroupValidationInformationToFoundGroups everything should be > fine. > > > > Any help with this issue is appreciated! > > Regards, > > Manuel > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2012 21:49 > > An: MyFaces Discussion > > Betreff: Re: @BeanValidation annotation at class level > > > > hi manuel, > > > > you can check it in ExtValBeanValidationMetaDataInternals# > > extractExtValBeanValidationMetaData > > (see #inspectFirstBean (= class level), #inspectFirstProperty, > > #inspectBaseOfProperty (= class level) and #inspectLastProperty) > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - > > JavaEE Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > 2012/10/18 <manuel.gamerdin...@t-systems.com> > > > > > Hello MyFaces ExtVal users, > > > > > > I've a question regarding group validation together with > > > @BeanValidation annotation. In my example the @BeanValidation > > > annotation only works on page bean fields. On class level it seems > > > that > > the annotation is ignored. > > > > > > This works: > > > @BeanValidation(useGroups=IUiGroupStage2.class) > > > private String wmc; > > > > > > This doesn't work: > > > @BeanValidation(useGroups=IUiGroupStage2.class) > > > public class HomeDlg implements Serializable { > > > > > > The following documentation states that it should be possible to > > > declare the annotation at class level: > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Extensions/Validator/DevDoc > > > But now how can I make it run? Is there some configuration to be done? > > > > > > Thanx in advance! > > > Manuel > > > > > > > > >
