Hi Heiko!

I'll create a unit test for it and test it before we kick off the build for the 
release.

LieGrue,
strub




----- Original Message -----
> From: "it-media.k...@daimler.com" <it-media.k...@daimler.com>
> To: users@myfaces.apache.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2013 1:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: EXTCDI - Specializing ClientConfig with different 
> WindowHandlerHtml leads to endless loop?
> 
> Hello,
> 
> it is happening in IE 8 and FF 19 beta 4. Both react in the same way. This 
> only happends as soon as I override the ClientConfig with my own version 
> like this:
> 
> @SessionScoped
> @Specializes
> public class MaksClientConfig extends ClientConfig implements Serializable
> {
>     /** ID necessary for serialization */
>     private static final long serialVersionUID = -3974881285407719139L;
> 
>     private static final String MAKS_WINDOW_HANDLER_HTML_FILE = 
> "insecure/windowhandler.html";
> 
>     @Override
>     public String getWindowHandlerResourceLocation()
>     {
>         return MAKS_WINDOW_HANDLER_HTML_FILE;
>     }
> }
> 
> If I set the handler back to its original position like this:
> 
> private static final String MAKS_WINDOW_HANDLER_HTML_FILE = 
> "static/windowhandler.html";
> 
> it works again. 
> 
> Very weird!!!
> 
> Greets,
> 
> Heiko
> 
> --
> Heiko Kopp / Fa. Vision iT media GmbH
> 
> Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build 
> bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to build 
> bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning. 
> 
> 
> 
> strub...@yahoo.de 
> 01.02.2013 09:46
> Bitte antworten an
> users@myfaces.apache.org
> 
> 
> An
> users@myfaces.apache.org
> Kopie
> 
> Thema
> Re: EXTCDI - Specializing ClientConfig with different WindowHandlerHtml 
> leads to endless loop?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Heiko!
> 
> Does this also happen on Firefox or only on IE? And if so, which IE 
> version exactly?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: "it-media.k...@daimler.com" 
> <it-media.k...@daimler.com>
>>  To: users@myfaces.apache.org
>>  Cc: 
>>  Sent: Friday, February 1, 2013 8:20 AM
>>  Subject: EXTCDI - Specializing ClientConfig with different 
> WindowHandlerHtml leads to endless loop?
>> 
>>  Hello everone,
>> 
>>  I've tried to change the "Nag-Screen" of the Client Side 
> Window 
>>  Handler of 
>>  EXTCDI by specializing ClientConfig in the following way:
>> 
>>  @SessionScoped
>>  @Specializes
>>  public class MaksClientConfig extends ClientConfig implements 
> Serializable
>>  {
>>      /** ID necessary for serialization */
>>      private static final long serialVersionUID = -3974881285407719139L;
>> 
>>      private static final String MAKS_WINDOW_HANDLER_HTML_FILE = 
>>  "insecure/windowhandler.html";
>> 
>>      @Override
>>      public String getWindowHandlerResourceLocation()
>>      {
>>          return MAKS_WINDOW_HANDLER_HTML_FILE;
>>      }
>>  }
>> 
>>  The file "insecure/windowhandler.html" is a simple COPY of the 
>>  original 
>>  file delivered with EXTCDI 1.0.6-SNAPSHOT. When I do so, this ends up in 
> 
>>  an endless loop in Internet Explorer. The parameter 'windowId' 
> always 
>>  stays "automatedEntryPoint". 
>> 
>>  The cookie is once set to something like 
>>  7742-codiWindowId=automatedEntryPoint and on a second reload to another 
>>  number e.g. 8631-codiWindowId=automatedEntryPoint, but it cycles here 
> and 
>>  does not continue.
>> 
>>  What do I miss here? 
>> 
>>  Thanks,
>> 
>>  Best regards,
>> 
>>  Heiko
>> 
>>  --
>>  Heiko Kopp / Fa. Vision iT media GmbH
>> 
>>  Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build 
> 
>>  bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to build 
> 
>>  bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning. 
>> 
>>  If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that 
> you 
>>  have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank you for your 
> 
>>  cooperation.  
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that you 
> have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank you for your 
> cooperation.  
>

Reply via email to