When i dont want to use codi I use jndi lookup, it is to easy to use and portable. I create a simple method for retrive my ejbs without using codi instead i use jndi using only the name of the ejb class. El 13/04/2013 11:45, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <smithh032...@gmail.com> escribió:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:16 PM, José Luis Cetina <maxtorz...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > > > 2. The way i use the converter are in separeted classes and in each > > converter if i need an ejb injected (limitation of jsf 2.1 this is > "fixed" > > in jsf 2.2 ) i use Apache CODI for get the reference of my ejb or i do a > > lookup using jndi. Using like this way all my converters are classes > > annotated with facesconverter that i can reuse in any jsf page using the > > converter tag or if the component provide a converter attribute i use the > > name of the facesconverter and with this i dont have create an instance > of > > the converter in any managedbean, my app have more than 40 converters in > > this way without any problem . IMO i dont see why you want to use static > > converter. > > > > Trust me, i do 'not' want to use 'static', but it works-as-designed, right > now. Your response/implementation is interesting. I thought that Apache > CODI may be able to resolve this issue, but I recently removed Apache CODI > from my project, as I didn't need it anymore, since someone else initiated > a thread/topic about using bean manager instead of Apache CODI's bean > manager. I'm wonder if I can use the container's bean manager instead of > Apache CODI bean manager. I will try to implement as you mentioned above. > Thanks Jose. >
