As you already know, MyFaces provide some extensions and those extensions
register some CDI beans. But the way how the dependencies are loaded are
controlled by Tomee and by the CDI implementation, in this case OWB. I have
tried in the past to avoid the CDI beans in the integration point, but it
is not possible, you need one in order to hold the beans in the scope, and
you cannot access JSF from CDI (it works the opposite, access CDI from JSF).

regards,

Leonardo Uribe


2014-09-04 15:25 GMT-05:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:

> the issue is wars of an ear inherit from "lib" beans so mf shouldn't
> use it (can be done adding a bean with a generated name by webapp -
> and get the name from the servlet context for instance)
>
> on tomee side we can skip mf cdi beans in ear lib part if it can help
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-09-04 22:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> > @Leonardo: with ears?
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> > 2014-09-04 22:12 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I have tested the latest snapshot from trunk and it is working with
> tomee
> >> 1.7.0. I don't see any exception from this side.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> Leonardo Uribe
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-09-03 17:23 GMT-05:00 José Luis Cetina <maxtorz...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hi, i was trying to use MyFaces 2.2.4 with TomEE 1.7.0 JAX-RS, i want
> to
> >>> use myfaces 2.2.4 because i want to use the
> @javax.faces.view.ViewScoped (i
> >>> use the omnifaces viewscoped) and the f:viewAction.
> >>>
> >>> But again im getting
> javax.enterprise.inject.AmbiguousResolutionException:
> >>> Ambiguous resolution exception that i reported a few months ago,
> apparently
> >>> myfaces 2.2.4 is not working with ears in tomee 1.7.0.
> >>>
> >>> I already reported to tomee mailing list but @Romain sayed
> >>>
> >>> "think so but more a MF issue this time I think"
> >>>
> >>> @Leonardo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2014-01-15 17:14 GMT-06:00 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <
> smithh032...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> > if you are not able to use MyFaces 2.2 @ViewScoped, you may need to
> keep
> >>> > OmniFaces CDI @ViewScoped until someone helps you with your issue.
> >>> >
> >>> > Some months ago, I tested MyFaces 2.2 with OmniFaces CDI
> @ViewScoped; all
> >>> > of my @ViewScoped beans were still OmniFaces CDI @ViewScoped, and I
> >>> > experienced no issues. My app is not packaged as an EAR.
> >>> >
> >>> > today, i am using MyFaces 2.2 @ViewScoped beans even though I still
> have
> >>> > OmniFAces 1.6.3 JAR/dependency (not using OmniFaces CDI @ViewScoped).
> >>> >
> >>> > For the first day, running MyFaces 2.2, I am quite pleased. No
> issues to
> >>> > report, no exceptions in tomee/tomcat log files.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:57 PM, José Luis Cetina <
> maxtorz...@gmail.com
> >>> > >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > I removed CODI and my app is package as ear. maybe i need to try
> tomee
> >>> > > 1.6.1-snapshot
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > 2014/1/15 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com>
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:40 PM, José Luis Cetina <
> >>> > maxtorz...@gmail.com
> >>> > > > >wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > I removed my faces 2.1.13 jars (api and imp) from tomee lib
> and add
> >>> > > > myfaces
> >>> > > > > api and impl 2.2.0
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > that's exactly what I did and I don't get the error.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Jose, are you still using MyFaces CODI (1.5 or 1.6.x) and EAR,
> too?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > > *SCJA. José Luis Cetina*
> >>> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> *José Luis Cetina*
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
>

Reply via email to